From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH for-next 0/7] cqe posting cleanups
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 12:26:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Apart from this patches removing some implicit assumptions, which we
had problems with before, and making code cleaner, they and especially
6-7 are also needed to push for synchronisation optimisations later, lile
[1] or removing spinlocking with SINGLE_ISSUER.
The downside is that we add additional lock/unlock into eventfd path,
but I don't think we care about it.
The series also exposes a minor issue with cancellations, which for some
reason calls io_kill_timeouts() and io_poll_remove_all() too many times on
task exit. That makes poll-cancel to timeout on sigalarm, though usually
is fine if given 3-5 sec instead of 1. We'll investigate it later.
[1] https://github.com/isilence/linux/commit/6224f58bf7b542e6aed1eed44ee6bd5b5f706437
Pavel Begunkov (7):
io_uring: remove extra io_commit_cqring()
io_uring: reshuffle io_uring/io_uring.h
io_uring: move io_eventfd_signal()
io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in evenfd paths
io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation
io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting
io_uring: add io_commit_cqring_flush()
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 2 +
io_uring/io_uring.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
io_uring/io_uring.h | 108 ++++++++++++++-----------
io_uring/rw.c | 5 +-
io_uring/timeout.c | 7 +-
5 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-19 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-19 11:26 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 1/7] io_uring: remove extra io_commit_cqring() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 2/7] io_uring: reshuffle io_uring/io_uring.h Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 3/7] io_uring: move io_eventfd_signal() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 4/7] io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in evenfd paths Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 18:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 18:49 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 5/7] io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 13:31 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 14:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 15:52 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 16:15 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 16:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 16:38 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 16:38 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 6/7] io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 13:30 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 14:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 15:50 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-19 11:26 ` [PATCH for-next 7/7] io_uring: add io_commit_cqring_flush() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 12:36 ` [PATCH for-next 0/7] cqe posting cleanups Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-19 16:01 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox