From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Subject: [RFC for-next v2 0/4] enable pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:50:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
This series implements bio pcpu caching for normal / IRQ-driven I/O
extending REQ_ALLOC_CACHE currently limited to iopoll. The allocation side
still only works from non-irq context, which is the reason it's not enabled
by default, but turning it on for other users (e.g. filesystems) is
as a matter of passing a flag.
t/io_uring with an Optane SSD setup showed +7% for batches of 32 requests
and +4.3% for batches of 8.
IRQ, 128/32/32, cache off
IOPS=59.08M, BW=28.84GiB/s, IOS/call=31/31
IOPS=59.30M, BW=28.96GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
IOPS=59.97M, BW=29.28GiB/s, IOS/call=31/31
IOPS=59.92M, BW=29.26GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
IOPS=59.81M, BW=29.20GiB/s, IOS/call=32/31
IRQ, 128/32/32, cache on
IOPS=64.05M, BW=31.27GiB/s, IOS/call=32/31
IOPS=64.22M, BW=31.36GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
IOPS=64.04M, BW=31.27GiB/s, IOS/call=31/31
IOPS=63.16M, BW=30.84GiB/s, IOS/call=32/32
IRQ, 32/8/8, cache off
IOPS=50.60M, BW=24.71GiB/s, IOS/call=7/8
IOPS=50.22M, BW=24.52GiB/s, IOS/call=8/7
IOPS=49.54M, BW=24.19GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
IOPS=50.07M, BW=24.45GiB/s, IOS/call=7/7
IOPS=50.46M, BW=24.64GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
IRQ, 32/8/8, cache on
IOPS=51.39M, BW=25.09GiB/s, IOS/call=8/7
IOPS=52.52M, BW=25.64GiB/s, IOS/call=7/8
IOPS=52.57M, BW=25.67GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
IOPS=52.58M, BW=25.67GiB/s, IOS/call=8/7
IOPS=52.61M, BW=25.69GiB/s, IOS/call=8/8
The main part is in patch 3. Would be great to take patch 1 separately
for 6.1 for extra safety.
v2: fix botched splicing threshold checks
Pavel Begunkov (4):
bio: safeguard REQ_ALLOC_CACHE bio put
bio: split pcpu cache part of bio_put into a helper
block/bio: add pcpu caching for non-polling bio_put
io_uring/rw: enable bio caches for IRQ rw
block/bio.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
io_uring/rw.c | 3 +-
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.38.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 19:50 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-10-18 19:50 ` [RFC for-next v2 1/4] bio: safeguard REQ_ALLOC_CACHE bio put Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-20 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-18 19:50 ` [RFC for-next v2 2/4] bio: split pcpu cache part of bio_put into a helper Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-20 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-18 19:50 ` [RFC for-next v2 3/4] block/bio: add pcpu caching for non-polling bio_put Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-20 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 12:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-18 19:50 ` [RFC for-next v2 4/4] io_uring/rw: enable bio caches for IRQ rw Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-20 8:32 ` [RFC for-next v2 0/4] enable pcpu bio caching for IRQ I/O Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 12:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-10-20 12:53 ` Jens Axboe
2022-10-20 12:50 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox