From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: kill fasync
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 15:17:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 10/1/21 3:07 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 10/1/21 10:39 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> We have never supported fasync properly, it would only fire when there
>> is something polling io_uring making it useless. Get rid of fasync bits.
>
> Actually, it looks there is something screwed, let's hold on this
My bad, failed because of unrelated change, this one is good to go
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 17 ++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index c6a82c67a93d..f76a9b6bed2c 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -398,7 +398,6 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
>> struct wait_queue_head cq_wait;
>> unsigned cq_extra;
>> atomic_t cq_timeouts;
>> - struct fasync_struct *cq_fasync;
>> unsigned cq_last_tm_flush;
>> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>>
>> @@ -1614,10 +1613,8 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
>> if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
>> eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
>> - if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->poll_wait)) {
>> + if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->poll_wait))
>> wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->poll_wait);
>> - kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> @@ -1631,10 +1628,8 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> }
>> if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
>> eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
>> - if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->poll_wait)) {
>> + if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->poll_wait))
>> wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->poll_wait);
>> - kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> /* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
>> @@ -9304,13 +9299,6 @@ static __poll_t io_uring_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>> return mask;
>> }
>>
>> -static int io_uring_fasync(int fd, struct file *file, int on)
>> -{
>> - struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
>> -
>> - return fasync_helper(fd, file, on, &ctx->cq_fasync);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int io_unregister_personality(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned id)
>> {
>> const struct cred *creds;
>> @@ -10155,7 +10143,6 @@ static const struct file_operations io_uring_fops = {
>> .mmap_capabilities = io_uring_nommu_mmap_capabilities,
>> #endif
>> .poll = io_uring_poll,
>> - .fasync = io_uring_fasync,
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> .show_fdinfo = io_uring_show_fdinfo,
>> #endif
>>
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-01 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-01 9:39 [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: kill fasync Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-01 14:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-01 14:17 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-10-01 17:16 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox