From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 12:14:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/1/20 9:18 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> There are several independent parts in the patchset, but bundled
> to make a point.
> 1-2: random stuff, that implicitly used later.
> 3-5: restore @nxt propagation
> 6-8: optimise locking in io_worker_handle_work()
> 9: optimise io_uring refcounting
>
> The next propagation bits are done similarly as it was before, but
> - nxt stealing is now at top-level, but not hidden in handlers
> - ensure there is no with REQ_F_DONT_STEAL_NEXT
>
> [6-8] is the reason to dismiss the previous @nxt propagation appoach,
> I didn't found a good way to do the same. Even though it looked
> clearer and without new flag.
>
> Performance tested it with link-of-nops + IOSQE_ASYNC:
>
> link size: 100
> orig: 501 (ns per nop)
> 0-8: 446
> 0-9: 416
>
> link size: 10
> orig: 826
> 0-8: 776
> 0-9: 756
This looks nice, I'll take a closer look tomorrow or later today. Seems
that at least patch 2 should go into 5.6 however, so may make sense to
order the series like that.
BTW, Andres brought up a good point, and that's hashed file write works.
Generally they complete super fast (just copying into the page cache),
which means that that worker will be hammering the wq lock a lot. Since
work N+1 can't make any progress before N completes (since that's how
hashed work works), we should pull a bigger batch of these work items
instead of just one at the time. I think that'd potentially make a huge
difference for the performance of buffered writes.
Just throwing it out there, since you're working in that space anyway
and the rewards will be much larger.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-01 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-01 16:18 [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] io_uring: clean up io_close Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 14:24 ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] io_uring: make submission ref putting consistent Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] io_uring: remove @nxt from handlers Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] io_uring: get next req on subm ref drop Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 21:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] io-wq: io_worker_handle_work() optimise locking Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] io-wq: optimise double lock for io_get_next_work() Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] io_uring: pass submission ref to async Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 21:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 15:08 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
2020-03-02 15:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 16:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-01 19:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-03-01 20:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-03-02 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox