From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: io_uring's openat doesn't work with large (2G+) files
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 08:29:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOKbgA7KYWE485vAY2iLOjb4Ve-yLCTsTADqce-77a0CQxnszg@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/8/20 8:50 PM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:26 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/8/20 9:12 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:49 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/8/20 8:41 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:36 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/8/20 8:30 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:19 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/8/20 7:51 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> io_uring's openat seems to produce FDs that are incompatible with
>>>>>>>>> large files (>2GB). If a file (smaller than 2GB) is opened using
>>>>>>>>> io_uring's openat then writes -- both using io_uring and just sync
>>>>>>>>> pwrite() -- past that threshold fail with EFBIG. If such a file is
>>>>>>>>> opened with sync openat, then both io_uring's writes and sync writes
>>>>>>>>> succeed. And if the file is larger than 2GB then io_uring's openat
>>>>>>>>> fails right away, while the sync one works.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kernel versions: 5.6.0-rc2, 5.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A couple of reproducers attached, one demos successful open with
>>>>>>>>> failed writes afterwards, and another failing open (in comparison with
>>>>>>>>> sync calls).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The output of the former one for example:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** sync openat
>>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
>>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 0
>>>>>>>>> write succeeded
>>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 4294967296
>>>>>>>>> write succeeded
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** sync openat
>>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
>>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 0
>>>>>>>>> write succeeded
>>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 4294967296
>>>>>>>>> write succeeded
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** io_uring openat
>>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
>>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 0
>>>>>>>>> write succeeded
>>>>>>>>> sync write at offset 4294967296
>>>>>>>>> write failed: File too large
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** io_uring openat
>>>>>>>>> openat succeeded
>>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 0
>>>>>>>>> write succeeded
>>>>>>>>> io_uring write at offset 4294967296
>>>>>>>>> write failed: File too large
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you try with this one? Seems like only openat2 gets it set,
>>>>>>>> not openat...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've tried specifying O_LARGEFILE explicitly, that did not change the
>>>>>>> behavior. Is this good enough? Much faster for me to check this way
>>>>>>> that rebuilding the kernel. But if necessary I can do that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure O_LARGEFILE settings is going to do it for x86-64, the patch
>>>>>> should fix it though. Might have worked on 32-bit, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, will test.
>>>>
>>>> Great, thanks. FWIW, tested here, and it works for me.
>>>
>>> Great, will post results tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> With the patch applied it works perfectly, thanks.
Thanks for testing!
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-09 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 14:51 io_uring's openat doesn't work with large (2G+) files Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 15:19 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 15:30 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 15:41 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 15:49 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 16:12 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-09 3:50 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-09 15:29 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-04-13 9:20 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-13 10:09 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-04-13 10:19 ` Dmitry Kadashev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox