From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix mm use with IORING_OP_{READ,WRITE}
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:16:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/5/20 9:05 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/5/20 9:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 05/02/2020 18:54, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 2/5/20 8:46 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> IORING_OP_{READ,WRITE} need mm to access user buffers, hence
>>>> req->has_user check should go for them as well. Move the corresponding
>>>> imports past the check.
>>>
>>> I'd need to double check, but I think the has_user check should just go.
>>> The import checks for access anyway, so we'll -EFAULT there if we
>>> somehow messed up and didn't acquire the right mm.
>>>
>> It'd be even better. I have plans to remove it, but I was thinking from a
>> different angle.
>
> Let me just confirm it in practice, but it should be fine. Then we can just
> kill it.
OK now I remember - in terms of mm it's fine, we'll do the right thing.
But the iov_iter_init() has this gem:
/* It will get better. Eventually... */
if (uaccess_kernel()) {
i->type = ITER_KVEC | direction;
i->kvec = (struct kvec *)iov;
} else {
i->type = ITER_IOVEC | direction;
i->iov = iov;
}
which means that if we haven't set USER_DS, then iov_iter_init() will
magically set the type to ITER_KVEC which then crashes when the iterator
tries to copy.
Which is pretty lame. How about a patch that just checks for
uaccess_kernel() and -EFAULTs if true for the non-fixed variants where
we don't init the iter ourselves? Then we can still kill req->has_user
and not have to fill it in.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 15:46 [PATCH] io_uring: fix mm use with IORING_OP_{READ,WRITE} Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-05 15:54 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-05 16:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-05 16:05 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-05 16:16 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-02-05 16:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-02-05 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
2020-02-05 16:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox