From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Boris Pismenny <[email protected]>,
John Fastabend <[email protected]>,
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Problem with io_uring splice and KTLS
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:28:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 10/10/23 8:19 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working with a webserver using io_uring in conjunction with KTLS. The
> webserver basically splices static file data from a pipe to a socket which uses
> KTLS for encryption. When splice is done the socket is closed. This works fine
> when using software encryption in KTLS. Things go awry though when the software
> encryption is replaced with the CAAM driver which replaces the synchronous
> encryption with a asynchronous queue/interrupt/completion flow.
>
> So far I have traced it down to tls_push_sg() calling tcp_sendmsg_locked() to
> send the completed encrypted messages. tcp_sendmsg_locked() sometimes waits for
> more memory on the socket by calling sk_stream_wait_memory(). This in turn
> returns -ERESTARTSYS due to:
>
> if (signal_pending(current))
> goto do_interrupted;
>
> The current task has the TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL set due to:
>
> io_req_normal_work_add()
> {
> ...
> /* This interrupts sk_stream_wait_memory() (notify_method == TWA_SIGNAL) */
> task_work_add(req->task, &tctx->task_work, ctx->notify_method)))
> }
>
> The call stack when sk_stream_wait_memory() fails is as follows:
>
> [ 1385.428816] dump_backtrace+0xa0/0x128
> [ 1385.432568] show_stack+0x20/0x38
> [ 1385.435878] dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60
> [ 1385.439539] dump_stack+0x18/0x28
> [ 1385.442850] tls_push_sg+0x100/0x238
> [ 1385.446424] tls_tx_records+0x118/0x1d8
> [ 1385.450257] tls_sw_release_resources_tx+0x74/0x1a0
> [ 1385.455135] tls_sk_proto_close+0x2f8/0x3f0
> [ 1385.459315] inet_release+0x58/0xb8
> [ 1385.462802] inet6_release+0x3c/0x60
> [ 1385.466374] __sock_release+0x48/0xc8
> [ 1385.470035] sock_close+0x20/0x38
> [ 1385.473347] __fput+0xbc/0x280
> [ 1385.476399] ____fput+0x18/0x30
> [ 1385.479537] task_work_run+0x80/0xe0
> [ 1385.483108] io_run_task_work+0x40/0x108
> [ 1385.487029] __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x164/0xad8
> [ 1385.491907] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
> [ 1385.495655] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf0
> [ 1385.500359] do_el0_svc_compat+0x24/0x40
> [ 1385.504279] el0_svc_compat+0x38/0x108
> [ 1385.508026] el0t_32_sync_handler+0x98/0x140
> [ 1385.512294] el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198
>
> So the socket is being closed and KTLS tries to send out the remaining
> completed messages. From a splice point of view everything has been sent
> successfully, but not everything made it through KTLS to the socket and the
> remaining data is sent while closing the socket.
>
> I vaguely understand what's going on here, but I haven't got the
> slightest idea what to do about this. Any ideas?
Two things to try:
1) Depending on how you use the ring, set it up with
IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER | IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN. The latter will
avoid using signal based task_work notifications, which may be messing
you up here.
2) io_uring will hold a reference to the file/socket. I'm unsure if this
is a problem in the above case, but sometimes it'll prevent the final
flush.
Do you have a reproducer that could be run to test? Sometimes easier to
see what's going on when you can experiment, it'll save some time.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-10 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 14:19 Problem with io_uring splice and KTLS Sascha Hauer
2023-10-10 14:28 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-10-11 11:21 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-12 13:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-13 1:13 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 1:45 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-13 5:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-13 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-16 7:26 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-16 13:17 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-17 11:51 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox