From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix blocking inline submission
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:42:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d60270856b8a4560a639ef5f76e55eb563633599.1623236455.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
在 2021/6/9 下午7:07, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
> There is a complaint against sys_io_uring_enter() blocking if it submits
> stdin reads. The problem is in __io_file_supports_async(), which
> sees that it's a cdev and allows it to be processed inline.
>
> Punt char devices using generic rules of io_file_supports_async(),
> including checking for presence of *_iter() versions of rw callbacks.
> Apparently, it will affect most of cdevs with some exceptions like
> null and zero devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> "...For now, just ensure that anything potentially problematic is done
> inline". I believe this part is outdated, but what use cases we miss?
> Anything that we care about?
>
> IMHO the best option is to do like in this patch and add
> (read,write)_iter(), to places we care about.
>
> /dev/[u]random, consoles, any else?
>
This reminds me another thing, once I did nowait read on a brd(block
ramdisk), I saw a 10%~30% regression after __io_file_supports_async()
added. brd is bio based device (block layer doesn't support nowait IO
for this kind of device), so theoretically it makes sense to punt it to
iowq threads in advance in __io_file_supports_async(), but actually
what originally happen is: IOCB_NOWAIT is not delivered to block
layer(REQ_NOWAIT) and then the IO request is executed inline (It seems
brd device won't block). This finally makes 'check it in advance'
slower..
> fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 42380ed563c4..44d1859f0dfb 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2616,7 +2616,7 @@ static bool __io_file_supports_async(struct file *file, int rw)
> return true;
> return false;
> }
> - if (S_ISCHR(mode) || S_ISSOCK(mode))
> + if (S_ISSOCK(mode))
> return true;
> if (S_ISREG(mode)) {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLOCK) &&
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-09 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 11:07 [PATCH] io_uring: fix blocking inline submission Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 12:42 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-06-14 10:24 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-09 15:34 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-09 15:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:43 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-09 15:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14 9:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:38 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8033ef5-f22e-10a7-d836-0e66455327cf@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox