public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix blocking inline submission
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:42:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d60270856b8a4560a639ef5f76e55eb563633599.1623236455.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

在 2021/6/9 下午7:07, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
> There is a complaint against sys_io_uring_enter() blocking if it submits
> stdin reads. The problem is in __io_file_supports_async(), which
> sees that it's a cdev and allows it to be processed inline.
> 
> Punt char devices using generic rules of io_file_supports_async(),
> including checking for presence of *_iter() versions of rw callbacks.
> Apparently, it will affect most of cdevs with some exceptions like
> null and zero devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> "...For now, just ensure that anything potentially problematic is done
> inline". I believe this part is outdated, but what use cases we miss?
> Anything that we care about?
> 
> IMHO the best option is to do like in this patch and add
> (read,write)_iter(), to places we care about.
> 
> /dev/[u]random, consoles, any else?
> 
This reminds me another thing, once I did nowait read on a brd(block
ramdisk), I saw a 10%~30% regression after __io_file_supports_async()
added. brd is bio based device (block layer doesn't support nowait IO
for this kind of device), so theoretically it makes sense to punt it to
iowq threads in advance in __io_file_supports_async(), but actually
what originally happen is: IOCB_NOWAIT is not delivered to block
layer(REQ_NOWAIT) and then the IO request is executed inline (It seems
brd device won't block). This finally makes 'check it in advance'
slower..
>   fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 42380ed563c4..44d1859f0dfb 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2616,7 +2616,7 @@ static bool __io_file_supports_async(struct file *file, int rw)
>   			return true;
>   		return false;
>   	}
> -	if (S_ISCHR(mode) || S_ISSOCK(mode))
> +	if (S_ISSOCK(mode))
>   		return true;
>   	if (S_ISREG(mode)) {
>   		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLOCK) &&
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-09 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09 11:07 [PATCH] io_uring: fix blocking inline submission Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 12:42 ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-06-14 10:24   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-09 15:34   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:36     ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-09 15:41       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:43         ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-09 15:47           ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-14  9:30             ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-09 15:38 ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8033ef5-f22e-10a7-d836-0e66455327cf@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox