From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix UAF due to missing POLLFREE handling
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 06:47:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ed56b6f548f7ea337603a82315750449412748a.1642161259.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 1/14/22 4:59 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Fixes a problem described in 50252e4b5e989
> ("aio: fix use-after-free due to missing POLLFREE handling")
> and copies the approach used there.
>
> In short, we have to forcibly eject a poll entry when we meet POLLFREE.
> We can't rely on io_poll_get_ownership() as can't wait for potentially
> running tw handlers, so we use the fact that wqs are RCU freed. See
> Eric's patch and comments for more details.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
> Fixes: 221c5eb233823 ("io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_POLL")
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index fa3277844d2e..bc424af1833b 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -5462,12 +5462,14 @@ static void io_init_poll_iocb(struct io_poll_iocb *poll, __poll_t events,
>
> static inline void io_poll_remove_entry(struct io_poll_iocb *poll)
> {
> - struct wait_queue_head *head = poll->head;
> + struct wait_queue_head *head = smp_load_acquire(&poll->head);
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&head->lock);
> - list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
> - poll->head = NULL;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&head->lock);
> + if (head) {
> + spin_lock_irq(&head->lock);
> + list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
> + poll->head = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&head->lock);
> + }
> }
>
> static void io_poll_remove_entries(struct io_kiocb *req)
> @@ -5475,10 +5477,26 @@ static void io_poll_remove_entries(struct io_kiocb *req)
> struct io_poll_iocb *poll = io_poll_get_single(req);
> struct io_poll_iocb *poll_double = io_poll_get_double(req);
>
> - if (poll->head)
> - io_poll_remove_entry(poll);
> - if (poll_double && poll_double->head)
> + /*
> + * While we hold the waitqueue lock and the waitqueue is nonempty,
> + * wake_up_pollfree() will wait for us. However, taking the waitqueue
> + * lock in the first place can race with the waitqueue being freed.
> + *
> + * We solve this as eventpoll does: by taking advantage of the fact that
> + * all users of wake_up_pollfree() will RCU-delay the actual free. If
> + * we enter rcu_read_lock() and see that the pointer to the queue is
> + * non-NULL, we can then lock it without the memory being freed out from
> + * under us.
> + *
> + * Keep holding rcu_read_lock() as long as we hold the queue lock, in
> + * case the caller deletes the entry from the queue, leaving it empty.
> + * In that case, only RCU prevents the queue memory from being freed.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + io_poll_remove_entry(poll);
> + if (poll_double)
> io_poll_remove_entry(poll_double);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5618,13 +5636,37 @@ static int io_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
> wait);
> __poll_t mask = key_to_poll(key);
>
> + if (unlikely(mask & POLLFREE)) {
> + io_poll_mark_cancelled(req);
> + /* we have to kick tw in case it's not already */
> + io_poll_execute(req, 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the waitqueue is being freed early but someone is already
> + * holds ownership over it, we have to tear down the request as
> + * best we can. That means immediately removing the request from
> + * its waitqueue and preventing all further accesses to the
> + * waitqueue via the request.
> + */
> + list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
> +
> + /*
> + * Careful: this *must* be the last step, since as soon
> + * as req->head is NULL'ed out, the request can be
> + * completed and freed, since aio_poll_complete_work()
> + * will no longer need to take the waitqueue lock.
> + */
> + smp_store_release(&poll->head, NULL);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> /* for instances that support it check for an event match first */
> if (mask && !(mask & poll->events))
> return 0;
>
> if (io_poll_get_ownership(req)) {
> /* optional, saves extra locking for removal in tw handler */
> - if (mask && poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT) {
> + if (mask && (poll->events & EPOLLONESHOT)) {
> list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
> poll->head = NULL;
> }
Nice work, and good job documenting it too. Just one minor comment -
this last change here seems like it was a leftover thing, mind if I drop
this non-functional change from the patch?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 11:59 [PATCH] io_uring: fix UAF due to missing POLLFREE handling Pavel Begunkov
2022-01-14 13:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-01-14 14:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-01-14 15:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox