From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5.13 1/2] io_uring: add support for ns granularity of io_sq_thread_idle
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:11:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 4/29/21 4:41 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
> 在 2021/4/28 下午10:16, Jens Axboe 写道:
>> On 4/28/21 8:07 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>>> index e1ae46683301..311532ff6ce3 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
>>>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum {
>>>> #define IORING_SETUP_CLAMP (1U << 4) /* clamp SQ/CQ ring sizes */
>>>> #define IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ (1U << 5) /* attach to existing wq */
>>>> #define IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED (1U << 6) /* start with ring disabled */
>>>> +#define IORING_SETUP_IDLE_NS (1U << 7) /* unit of thread_idle is nano second */
>>>> enum {
>>>> IORING_OP_NOP,
>>>> @@ -259,7 +260,7 @@ struct io_uring_params {
>>>> __u32 cq_entries;
>>>> __u32 flags;
>>>> __u32 sq_thread_cpu;
>>>> - __u32 sq_thread_idle;
>>>> + __u64 sq_thread_idle;
>>>
>>> breaks userspace API
>>
>> And I don't think we need to. If you're using IDLE_NS, then the value
>> should by definition be small enough that it'd fit in 32-bits. If you
> I make it u64 since I thought users may want a full flexibility to set
> idle in nanosecond granularity(eg. (1e6 + 10) ns cannot be set by
It's a really weird user requiring such a precision. u32 allows up to
~1s, and if more is needed users can switch to ms mode, so in the worst
case the precision is 1/1000 of the desired value, more than enough.
> millisecond granularity). But I'm not sure if this deserve changing the
> userspace API.
That's not about deserve or not, we can't break ABI. Can be worked around,
e.g. by taking resv fields, but don't see a reason
>> need higher timeouts, don't set it and it's in usec instead.
>>
>> So I'd just leave this one alone.
>>
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 13:32 [PATCH RFC 5.13 0/2] adaptive sqpoll and its wakeup optimization Hao Xu
2021-04-28 13:32 ` [PATCH RFC 5.13 1/2] io_uring: add support for ns granularity of io_sq_thread_idle Hao Xu
2021-04-28 14:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-28 14:16 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-28 14:53 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-28 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-29 3:41 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-29 9:11 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2021-05-05 14:07 ` Hao Xu
2021-05-05 17:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-29 3:28 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-29 22:15 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-26 10:00 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-28 10:51 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-29 7:52 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-29 9:24 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-29 11:37 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-29 12:13 ` Hao Xu
2021-09-30 8:51 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-09-30 12:04 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-05 15:00 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-28 13:32 ` [PATCH RFC 5.13 2/2] io_uring: submit sqes in the original context when waking up sqthread Hao Xu
2021-04-28 14:12 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-29 4:12 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-28 14:34 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-28 14:37 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-29 4:37 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-29 9:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-05 11:20 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-28 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-28 14:50 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-28 14:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-28 14:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-28 15:09 ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-29 4:43 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-29 8:44 ` Hao Xu
2021-04-29 22:10 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-05-05 13:10 ` Hao Xu
2021-05-05 17:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-04-29 22:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox