From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: io_uring: io_fail_links() should only consider first linked timeout
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:06:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 11/20/19 8:02 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 11/20/2019 5:22 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> However, this is only true if linked timeout isn't fired. Otherwise,
>>> there is another bug, which isn't fixed by either of the patches. We
>>> need to clear REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT in io_link_timeout_fn() as well.
>>>
>>> Let: REQ -> L_TIMEOUT1 -> L_TIMEOUT2
>>> 1. L_TIMEOUT1 fired before REQ is completed
>>>
>>> 2. io_link_timeout_fn() removes L_TIMEOUT1 from the list:
>>> REQ|REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT -> L_TIMEOUT2
>>>
>>> 3. free_req(REQ) then call io_link_cancel_timeout(L_TIMEOUT2)
>>> leaking it (as described in my patch).
>>>
>>> P.S. haven't tried to test nor reproduce it yet.
>>
>> That's exactly the case I was worried about. In any case, it seems
>> prudent to handle it defensively.
>>
> Yeah, I've got from the patch that may have missed something.
>
> Will you add this "should clear REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT in
> io_link_timeout_fn()" (e.g. in v2), or should I?
I'll add it in the v2.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 22:33 io_uring: io_fail_links() should only consider first linked timeout Jens Axboe
2019-11-20 8:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-20 10:22 ` Bob Liu
2019-11-20 11:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-20 14:03 ` Bob Liu
2019-11-20 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-20 14:28 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-20 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2019-11-20 15:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-11-20 15:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox