From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Usama Arif <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 09:58:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 2/3/22 9:49 AM, Usama Arif wrote:
>> One thing that both mine and your version suffers from is if someone
>> does an eventfd unregister, and then immediately does an eventfd
>> register. If the rcu grace period hasn't passed, we'll get -EBUSY on
>> trying to do that, when I think the right behavior there would be to
>> wait for the grace period to pass.
>>
>> I do think we need to handle that gracefully, spurious -EBUSY is
>> impossible for an application to deal with.
>
> I don't think my version would suffer from this as its protected by
> locks? The mutex_unlock on ev_fd_lock in unregister happens only after
> the call_rcu. And the mutex is locked in io_eventfd_register at the
> start, so wouldnt get the -EBUSY if there is a register immediately
> after unregister?
The call_rcu() just registers it for getting the callback when the grace
period has passed, it doesn't mean it's done by the time it returns.
Hence there's definitely a window where you can enter
io_uring_register() with the callback still being pending, and you'd get
-EBUSY from that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 15:11 [PATCH 0/2] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce in io_uring_register for eventfd opcodes Usama Arif
2022-02-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce while registering/unregistering eventfd Usama Arif
2022-02-03 15:48 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-03 17:47 ` Usama Arif
2022-02-03 15:55 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-03 16:49 ` Usama Arif
2022-02-03 16:58 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-02-03 17:42 ` [External] " Usama Arif
2022-02-03 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: avoid ring quiesce for IORING_REGISTER_EVENTFD_ASYNC Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox