public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>,
	Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: bcachefs KASAN SLAB out of bounds
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:26:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 10/20/23 11:23 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 05:03:45PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> Hi Kent et al,
>>
>> Booting bcachefs/master (SHA a180af9d) with a stock Ubuntu 23.04
>> config plus CONFIG_KASAN=CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y, I have identified a
>> minimal and consistent reproducer [1] triggering a KASAN report after
>> ~90s of the fio workload [2].
>>
>> The report shows a SLAB out of bounds access in connection from IO
>> uring submission queue entries [3].
>>
>> I confirmed the report isn't emitted when using ext4 in place of
>> bcachefs; let me know if you'd like further testing on it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Daniel
>>
>> -- [1]
>>
>> modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=1048576
>> bcachefs format /dev/ram0
>> mount -t bcachefs /dev/ram0 /mnt
>> fio workload.fio
>>
>> -- [2] workload.fio
>>
>> [global]
>> group_reporting
>> ioengine=io_uring
>> directory=/mnt
>> size=16m
>> time_based
>> runtime=48h
>> iodepth=256
>> verify_async=8
>> bs=4k-64k
>> norandommap
>> random_distribution=zipf:0.5
>> ioengine=io_uring
>> numjobs=16
>> rw=randrw
>>
>> [job1]
>> direct=1
>>
>> [job2]
>> direct=0
>>
>> -- [3]
>>
>> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in io_req_local_work_add+0xf0/0x2a0
>> Read of size 4 at addr ffff888138305218 by task iou-wrk-2702/3275
>>
>> CPU: 38 PID: 3275 Comm: iou-wrk-2702 Not tainted 6.5.0+ #1
>> Hardware name: Supermicro AS -3014TS-i/H12SSL-i, BIOS 2.5 09/08/2022
>> Call Trace:
>>  <TASK>
>>  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70
>>  print_report+0xd2/0x660
>>  ? __virt_addr_valid+0x103/0x180
>>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
>>  ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x40/0x230
>>  ? io_req_local_work_add+0xf0/0x2a0
>>  kasan_report+0xd0/0x120
>>  ? io_req_local_work_add+0xf0/0x2a0
>>  __asan_load4+0x8e/0xd0
>>  io_req_local_work_add+0xf0/0x2a0
>>  ? __pfx_io_req_local_work_add+0x10/0x10
>>  io_req_complete_post+0x88/0x120
>>  io_issue_sqe+0x363/0x6b0
>>  io_wq_submit_work+0x10c/0x4d0
>>  io_worker_handle_work+0x494/0xa60
>>  io_wq_worker+0x3d5/0x660
>>  ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10
>>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
>>  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30
>>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
>>  ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x8b/0x100
>>  ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irq+0x10/0x10
>>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
>>  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30
>>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
>>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0x7f
>>  ? calculate_sigpending+0x5a/0x70
>>  ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10
>>  ret_from_fork+0x47/0x80
>>  ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10
>>  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
>> RIP: 0033:0x0
>> Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.
>> RSP: 002b:0000000000000000 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001aa
>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f752ea36718 RCX: 000055792b721268
>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000006
>> RBP: 00007f752ea36718 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
>> R13: 000055792d883950 R14: 00000000000532ed R15: 000055792d915740
>>  </TASK>
>>
>> Allocated by task 2702:
>>  kasan_save_stack+0x38/0x70
>>  kasan_set_track+0x25/0x40
>>  kasan_save_alloc_info+0x1e/0x40
>>  __kasan_slab_alloc+0x9d/0xa0
>>  slab_post_alloc_hook+0x5f/0xe0
>>  kmem_cache_alloc_bulk+0x264/0x3e0
>>  __io_alloc_req_refill+0x1d8/0x370
>>  io_submit_sqes+0x549/0xb80
>>  __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0x968/0x1330
>>  __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x7f/0xa0
>>  do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x90
>>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
>>
>> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888138305180
>> which belongs to the cache io_kiocb of size 224
>> The buggy address is located 152 bytes inside of        allocated
>> 224-byte region [ffff888138305180, ffff888138305260)
>>
>> The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
>> page:00000000f168c2d3 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000
>> index:0xffff8881383048c0 pfn:0x138304
>> head:00000000f168c2d3 order:2 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
>> memcg:ffff8881cfb7e001
>> flags: 0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
>> page_type: 0xffffffff()
>> raw: 0017ffffc0010200 ffff888126f670c0 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>> raw: ffff8881383048c0 000000008033002b 00000001ffffffff ffff8881cfb7e001
>> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>>
>> Memory state around the buggy address:
>>  ffff888138305100: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>  ffff888138305180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>> ffff888138305200: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>               ^
>>  ffff888138305280: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>  ffff888138305300: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> -- 
>> Daniel J Blueman
> 
> Beats me, this looks like an io_uring bug.

I think this is it:

commit 569f5308e54352a12181cc0185f848024c5443e8
Author: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Aug 9 13:22:16 2023 +0100

    io_uring: fix false positive KASAN warnings

which got added post 6.5.

-- 
Jens Axboe



      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-20 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAMVG2sss9S45sCRnV+0nQ2jcd+XTMqYXNZ0FObodhD9kFUhwyg@mail.gmail.com>
2023-10-20 17:23 ` bcachefs KASAN SLAB out of bounds Kent Overstreet
2023-10-20 17:26   ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox