From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] io_uring: cancelable uring_cmd
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 09:02:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 9/22/23 8:28 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> uring_cmd may never complete, such as ublk, in which uring cmd isn't
> completed until one new block request is coming from ublk block device.
>
> Add cancelable uring_cmd to provide mechanism to driver for cancelling
> pending commands in its own way.
>
> Add API of io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable() for driver to mark one command as
> cancelable, then io_uring will cancel this command in
> io_uring_cancel_generic(). ->uring_cmd() callback is reused for canceling
> command in driver's way, then driver gets notified with the cancelling
> from io_uring.
>
> Add API of io_uring_cmd_get_task() to help driver cancel handler
> deal with the canceling.
This looks better, a few comments:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index 8e61f8b7c2ce..29a7a7e71f57 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -249,10 +249,13 @@ enum io_uring_op {
> * sqe->uring_cmd_flags
> * IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED use registered buffer; pass this flag
> * along with setting sqe->buf_index.
> + * IORING_URING_CANCELABLE not for userspace
> * IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED driver use only
> */
> -#define IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED (1U << 0)
> -#define IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED (1U << 31)
> +#define IORING_URING_CMD_FIXED (1U << 0)
> +/* set by driver, and handled by io_uring to cancel this cmd */
> +#define IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE (1U << 30)
> +#define IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED (1U << 31)
If IORING_URING_CANCELABLE isn't UAPI, why stuff it in here? Should we
have a split where we retain the upper 8 bits for internal use, or
something like that?
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index 783ed0fff71b..a3135fd47a4e 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -3256,6 +3256,40 @@ static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_iowq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> + struct task_struct *task, bool cancel_all)
> +{
> + struct hlist_node *tmp;
> + struct io_kiocb *req;
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
> + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, &ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd,
> + hash_node) {
> + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req,
> + struct io_uring_cmd);
> + struct file *file = req->file;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!file->f_op->uring_cmd))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!cancel_all && req->task != task)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE) {
> + /* ->sqe isn't available if no async data */
> + if (!req_has_async_data(req))
> + cmd->sqe = NULL;
> + file->f_op->uring_cmd(cmd, IO_URING_F_CANCEL);
> + ret = true;
> + }
> + }
> + io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
I think it'd be saner to drop uring_lock here, and then:
> @@ -3307,6 +3341,7 @@ static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> ret |= io_kill_timeouts(ctx, task, cancel_all);
> if (task)
> ret |= io_run_task_work() > 0;
> + ret |= io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd(ctx, task, cancel_all);
> return ret;
> }
move this hunk into the uring_lock section. Also ensure that we do run
task_work for cancelation, should the uring_cmd side require that
(either now or eventually).
> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> index 537795fddc87..d6b200a0be33 100644
> --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,52 @@
> #include "rsrc.h"
> #include "uring_cmd.h"
>
> +static void io_uring_cmd_del_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> + unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + if (cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE) {
> + struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd);
> + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
> +
> + io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
> + cmd->flags &= ~IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE;
> + hlist_del(&req->hash_node);
> + io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
> + }
> +}
static void io_uring_cmd_del_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd);
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
if (!(cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE))
return;
io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
cmd->flags &= ~IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE;
hlist_del(&req->hash_node);
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
}
is cleaner imho. Minor nit.
> +
> +/*
> + * Mark this command as concelable, then io_uring_try_cancel_uring_cmd()
> + * will try to cancel this issued command by sending ->uring_cmd() with
> + * issue_flags of IO_URING_F_CANCEL.
> + *
> + * The command is guaranteed to not be done when calling ->uring_cmd()
> + * with IO_URING_F_CANCEL, but it is driver's responsibility to deal
> + * with race between io_uring canceling and normal completion.
> + */
> +int io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> + unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> + struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd);
> + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
> +
> + io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
> + if (!(cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE)) {
> + cmd->flags |= IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE;
> + hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd);
> + }
> + io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
A bit inconsistent here in terms of the locking. I'm assuming the
marking happens within issue, in which case it should be fine to do:
int io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd);
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
if (!(cmd->flags & IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE)) {
cmd->flags |= IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE;
io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
hlist_add_head(&req->hash_node, &ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd);
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
}
return 0;
}
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 14:28 [PATCH V2] io_uring: cancelable uring_cmd Ming Lei
2023-09-22 15:02 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-09-22 15:24 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox