From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/11] io_uring: separate wq for ring polling
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:46:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dea0be0bf990503443c5c6c337fc66824af7d590.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Don't use ->cq_wait for ring polling but add a separate wait queue for
it. We need it for following patches.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 2 +-
io_uring/io_uring.c | 3 ++-
io_uring/io_uring.h | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 8dfb6c4a35d9..0d94ee191c15 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/* Keep this last, we don't need it for the fast path */
-
+ struct wait_queue_head poll_wq;
struct io_restriction restrictions;
/* slow path rsrc auxilary data, used by update/register */
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index c251acf0964e..8d19b0812f30 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ static __cold struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
xa_init_flags(&ctx->personalities, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
mutex_init(&ctx->uring_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->cq_wait);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->poll_wq);
spin_lock_init(&ctx->completion_lock);
spin_lock_init(&ctx->timeout_lock);
INIT_WQ_LIST(&ctx->iopoll_list);
@@ -2788,7 +2789,7 @@ static __poll_t io_uring_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
__poll_t mask = 0;
- poll_wait(file, &ctx->cq_wait, wait);
+ poll_wait(file, &ctx->poll_wq, wait);
/*
* synchronizes with barrier from wq_has_sleeper call in
* io_commit_cqring
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index b5975e353aa1..c75bbb94703c 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -220,9 +220,18 @@ static inline void io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
smp_store_release(&ctx->rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
}
+static inline void io_poll_wq_wake(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->poll_wq))
+ __wake_up(&ctx->poll_wq, TASK_NORMAL, 0,
+ poll_to_key(EPOLL_URING_WAKE | EPOLLIN));
+}
+
/* requires smb_mb() prior, see wq_has_sleeper() */
static inline void __io_cqring_wake(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
+ io_poll_wq_wake(ctx);
+
/*
* Trigger waitqueue handler on all waiters on our waitqueue. This
* won't necessarily wake up all the tasks, io_should_wake() will make
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 14:46 [PATCH v3 00/11] CQ waiting / task_work optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] io_uring: move submitter_task out of cold cacheline Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] io_uring: refactor io_wake_function Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] io_uring: don't set TASK_RUNNING in local tw runner Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] io_uring: mark io_run_local_work static Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] io_uring: move io_run_local_work_locked Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] io_uring: add lazy poll_wq activation Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] io_uring: wake up optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] io_uring: waitqueue-less cq waiting Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] io_uring: add io_req_local_work_add wake fast path Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-09 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] io_uring: optimise deferred tw execution Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-11 18:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] CQ waiting / task_work optimisations Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dea0be0bf990503443c5c6c337fc66824af7d590.1673274244.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox