From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] block: add example ioctl
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:44:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 3/17/21 11:45 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 04:10:25PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> +static int blkdev_uring_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev,
>> + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct block_uring_cmd *bcmd = (struct block_uring_cmd *) &cmd->pdu;
>> +
>> + switch (bcmd->ioctl_cmd) {
>> + case BLKBSZGET:
>> + return block_size(bdev);
>> + default:
>> + return -ENOTTY;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static int blkdev_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
>> enum io_uring_cmd_flags flags)
>> {
>> struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(cmd->file->f_mapping->host);
>>
>> + switch (cmd->op) {
>> + case BLOCK_URING_OP_IOCTL:
>> + return blkdev_uring_ioctl(bdev, cmd);
>
> I don't think the two level dispatch here makes any sense. Then again
> I don't think this code makes sense either except as an example..
That's all it is, an example. And, for me, just a quick way to test
that everything stacks and layers appropriately. But yes, once we have
something more concrete, this POC can be dropped and then re-introduced
when there's a real use case.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 22:10 [PATCHSET v4 0/8] io_uring passthrough support Jens Axboe
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] io_uring: split up io_uring_sqe into hdr + main Jens Axboe
2021-03-18 5:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 18:40 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-19 11:20 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-19 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-24 22:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] io_uring: add infrastructure around io_uring_cmd_sqe issue type Jens Axboe
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] fs: add file_operations->uring_cmd() Jens Axboe
2021-03-18 5:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-17 1:27 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-17 1:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_URING_CMD Jens Axboe
2021-03-18 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 18:43 ` Jens Axboe
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] block: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd() Jens Axboe
2021-03-18 5:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: add example ioctl Jens Axboe
2021-03-18 5:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 12:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-03-18 18:44 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd() Jens Axboe
2022-02-17 1:03 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-03-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] net: add example SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ/SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox