public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] io_uring: support user sqe ext flags
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:24:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zie+RlbtckZJVE2J@fedora>

On 4/23/24 14:57, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:16:12PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 4/7/24 7:03 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> sqe->flags is u8, and now we have used 7 bits, so take the last one for
>>> extending purpose.
>>>
>>> If bit7(IOSQE_HAS_EXT_FLAGS_BIT) is 1, it means this sqe carries ext flags
>>> from the last byte(.ext_flags), or bit23~bit16 of sqe->uring_cmd_flags for
>>> IORING_OP_URING_CMD.
>>>
>>> io_slot_flags() return value is converted to `ULL` because the affected bits
>>> are beyond 32bit now.
>>
>> If we're extending flags, which is something we arguably need to do at
>> some point, I think we should have them be generic and not spread out.
> 
> Sorry, maybe I don't get your idea, and the ext_flag itself is always
> initialized in io_init_req(), like normal sqe->flags, same with its
> usage.
> 
>> If uring_cmd needs specific flags and don't have them, then we should
>> add it just for that.
> 
> The only difference is that bit23~bit16 of sqe->uring_cmd_flags is
> borrowed for uring_cmd's ext flags, because sqe byte0~47 have been taken,
> and can't be reused for generic flag. If we want to use byte48~63, it has
> to be overlapped with uring_cmd's payload, and it is one generic sqe
> flag, which is applied on uring_cmd too.

Which is exactly the mess nobody would want to see. And I'd also
argue 8 extra bits is not enough anyway, otherwise the history will
repeat itself pretty soon

> That is the only way I thought of, or any other suggestion for extending sqe
> flags generically?

idea 1: just use the last bit. When we need another one it'd be time
to think about a long overdue SQE layout v2, this way we can try
to make flags u32 and clean up other problems.

idea 2: the group assembling flag can move into cmds. Very roughly:

io_cmd_init() {
	ublk_cmd_init();
}

ublk_cmd_init() {
	io_uring_start_grouping(ctx, cmd);
}

io_uring_start_grouping(ctx, cmd) {
	ctx->grouping = true;
	ctx->group_head = cmd->req;
}

submit_sqe() {
	if (ctx->grouping) {
		link_to_group(req, ctx->group_head);
		if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_LINK))
			ctx->grouping = false;
	}
}

-- 
Pavel Begunkov

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-29 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-08  1:03 [RFC PATCH 0/9] io_uring: support sqe group and provide group kbuf Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] io_uring: net: don't check sqe->__pad2[0] for send zc Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] io_uring: support user sqe ext flags Ming Lei
2024-04-22 18:16   ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-23 13:57     ` Ming Lei
2024-04-29 15:24       ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2024-04-30  3:43         ` Ming Lei
2024-04-30 12:00           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-30 12:56             ` Ming Lei
2024-04-30 14:10               ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-30 15:46                 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-02 14:22                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-04  1:19                     ` Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] io_uring: add helper for filling cqes in __io_submit_flush_completions() Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] io_uring: add one output argument to io_submit_sqe Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] io_uring: support SQE group Ming Lei
2024-04-22 18:27   ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-23 13:08     ` Kevin Wolf
2024-04-24  1:39       ` Ming Lei
2024-04-25  9:27         ` Kevin Wolf
2024-04-26  7:53           ` Ming Lei
2024-04-26 17:05             ` Kevin Wolf
2024-04-29  3:34               ` Ming Lei
2024-04-29 15:48         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-30  3:07           ` Ming Lei
2024-04-29 15:32       ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-30  3:03         ` Ming Lei
2024-04-30 12:27           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-30 15:00             ` Ming Lei
2024-05-02 14:09               ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-05-04  1:56                 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-02 14:28               ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-04-24  0:46     ` Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] io_uring: support providing sqe group buffer Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] io_uring/uring_cmd: support provide group kernel buffer Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] ublk: support provide io buffer Ming Lei
2024-04-08  1:03 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] liburing: support sqe ext_flags & sqe group Ming Lei
2024-04-19  0:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] io_uring: support sqe group and provide group kbuf Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox