From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 21/25] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:26:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 6/15/22 10:41, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 6/14/22 22:37, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Add a new IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER flag and the userspace visible part
>> of it, i.e. put limitations of submitters. Also, don't allow it together
>> with IOPOLL as we're not going to put it to good use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 5 ++++-
>> io_uring/io_uring.c | 7 +++++--
>> io_uring/io_uring_types.h | 1 +
>> io_uring/tctx.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> io_uring/tctx.h | 4 ++--
>> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
[...]
>> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
>> index 15d209f334eb..4b90439808e3 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
>> @@ -3020,6 +3020,8 @@ static __cold void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> io_destroy_buffers(ctx);
>> if (ctx->sq_creds)
>> put_cred(ctx->sq_creds);
>> + if (ctx->submitter_task)
>> + put_task_struct(ctx->submitter_task);
>> /* there are no registered resources left, nobody uses it */
>> if (ctx->rsrc_node)
>> @@ -3752,7 +3754,7 @@ static int io_uring_install_fd(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct file *file)
>> if (fd < 0)
>> return fd;
>> - ret = io_uring_add_tctx_node(ctx);
>> + ret = __io_uring_add_tctx_node(ctx, false);
^^^^^^
Note this one
>> if (ret) {
>> put_unused_fd(fd);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -3972,7 +3974,8 @@ static long io_uring_setup(u32 entries, struct io_uring_params __user *params)
>> IORING_SETUP_CLAMP | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ |
>> IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED | IORING_SETUP_SUBMIT_ALL |
>> IORING_SETUP_COOP_TASKRUN | IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG |
>> - IORING_SETUP_SQE128 | IORING_SETUP_CQE32))
>> + IORING_SETUP_SQE128 | IORING_SETUP_CQE32 |
>> + IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> return io_uring_create(entries, &p, params);
>> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring_types.h b/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
>> index aba0f8cd6f49..f6d0ad25f377 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
>> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring_types.h
>> @@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
>> /* Keep this last, we don't need it for the fast path */
>> struct io_restriction restrictions;
>> + struct task_struct *submitter_task;
>> /* slow path rsrc auxilary data, used by update/register */
>> struct io_rsrc_node *rsrc_backup_node;
>> diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c
>> index 6adf659687f8..012be261dc50 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/tctx.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/tctx.c
>> @@ -81,12 +81,32 @@ __cold int io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *task,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -int __io_uring_add_tctx_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> +static int io_register_submitter(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>> + if (!ctx->submitter_task)
>> + ctx->submitter_task = get_task_struct(current);
>> + else if (ctx->submitter_task != current)
>> + ret = -EEXIST;
>> + mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> Seems we don't need this uring_lock:
> When we create a ring, we setup ctx->submitter_task before uring fd is
> installed so at that time nobody else can enter this code.
> when we enter this code later in io_uring_enter, we just read it.
Not really, we specifically don't set it just to the ring's
creator but to the first submitter. That's needed to be able to
create a ring in one task and pass it over to another.
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 14:36 [PATCH for-next v2 00/25] 5.20 cleanups and poll optimisations Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 01/25] io_uring: make reg buf init consistent Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 02/25] io_uring: move defer_list to slow data Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 03/25] io_uring: better caching for ctx timeout fields Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 04/25] io_uring: refactor ctx slow data placement Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 7:58 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:11 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 10:59 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 05/25] io_uring: move small helpers to headers Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 06/25] io_uring: explain io_wq_work::cancel_seq placement Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 07/25] io_uring: inline ->registered_rings Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 08/25] io_uring: don't set REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE in tw Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:36 ` [PATCH for-next v2 09/25] io_uring: never defer-complete multi-apoll Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 8:05 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 10/25] io_uring: kill REQ_F_COMPLETE_INLINE Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 8:20 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:18 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 10:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 11/25] io_uring: refactor io_req_task_complete() Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 17:45 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 17:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 12/25] io_uring: don't inline io_put_kbuf Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 13/25] io_uring: remove check_cq checking from hot paths Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 14/25] io_uring: poll: remove unnecessary req->ref set Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 15/25] io_uring: switch cancel_hash to use per entry spinlock Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 16/25] io_uring: pass poll_find lock back Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 17/25] io_uring: clean up io_try_cancel Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 18/25] io_uring: limit number hash buckets Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 19/25] io_uring: clean up io_ring_ctx_alloc Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 8:46 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 20/25] io_uring: use state completion infra for poll reqs Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 21/25] io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUER Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 9:34 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 9:41 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 10:26 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-06-15 11:08 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 22/25] io_uring: pass hash table into poll_find Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 23/25] io_uring: introduce a struct for hash table Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 24/25] io_uring: propagate locking state to poll cancel Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-14 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next v2 25/25] io_uring: mutex locked poll hashing Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 12:53 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-15 13:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-15 15:19 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox