From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: io-uring <[email protected]>
Cc: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>,
Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL IORING_OP_CLOSE cancelation state
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:18:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
IORING_OP_CLOSE is special in terms of cancelation, since it has an
intermediate state where we've removed the file descriptor but hasn't
closed the file yet. For that reason, it's currently marked with
IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL to prevent cancelation. This ensures that the op
is always run even if canceled, to prevent leaving us with a live file
but an fd that is gone. However, with SQPOLL, since a cancel request
doesn't carry any resources on behalf of the request being canceled, if
we cancel before any of the close op has been run, we can end up with
io-wq not having the ->files assigned. This can result in the following
oops reported by Joseph:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000d8
PGD 800000010b76f067 P4D 800000010b76f067 PUD 10b462067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 1 PID: 1788 Comm: io_uring-sq Not tainted 5.11.0-rc4 #1
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x19d/0x18c0
Code: 00 00 8b 1d fd 56 dd 08 85 db 0f 85 43 05 00 00 48 c7 c6 98 7b 95 82 48 c7 c7 57 96 93 82 e8 9a bc f5 ff 0f 0b e9 2b 05 00 00 <48> 81 3f c0 ca 67 8a b8 00 00 00 00 41 0f 45 c0 89 04 24 e9 81 fe
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001933828 EFLAGS: 00010002
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000000000d8
RBP: 0000000000000246 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888106e8a140 R15: 00000000000000d8
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000000000d8 CR3: 0000000106efa004 CR4: 00000000003706e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
lock_acquire+0x31a/0x440
? close_fd_get_file+0x39/0x160
? __lock_acquire+0x647/0x18c0
_raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
? close_fd_get_file+0x39/0x160
close_fd_get_file+0x39/0x160
io_issue_sqe+0x1334/0x14e0
? lock_acquire+0x31a/0x440
? __io_free_req+0xcf/0x2e0
? __io_free_req+0x175/0x2e0
? find_held_lock+0x28/0xb0
? io_wq_submit_work+0x7f/0x240
io_wq_submit_work+0x7f/0x240
io_wq_cancel_cb+0x161/0x580
? io_wqe_wake_worker+0x114/0x360
? io_uring_get_socket+0x40/0x40
io_async_find_and_cancel+0x3b/0x140
io_issue_sqe+0xbe1/0x14e0
? __lock_acquire+0x647/0x18c0
? __io_queue_sqe+0x10b/0x5f0
__io_queue_sqe+0x10b/0x5f0
? io_req_prep+0xdb/0x1150
? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0xb0
? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0xb0
? io_queue_sqe+0x235/0x4b0
io_queue_sqe+0x235/0x4b0
io_submit_sqes+0xd7e/0x12a0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
? io_sq_thread+0x3ae/0x940
io_sq_thread+0x207/0x940
? do_wait_intr_irq+0xc0/0xc0
? __ia32_sys_io_uring_enter+0x650/0x650
kthread+0x134/0x180
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x90/0x90
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Fix this by moving the IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL until _after_ we've modified
the fdtable. Canceling before this point is totally fine, and running
it in the io-wq context _after_ that point is also fine.
For 5.12, we'll handle this internally and get rid of the no-cancel
flag, as IORING_OP_CLOSE is the only user of it.
Fixes: 14587a46646d ("io_uring: enable file table usage for SQPOLL rings")
Reported-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
Joseph, can you test this patch and see if this fixes it for you?
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index b76bb50f18c7..5f6f1e48954e 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4472,7 +4472,6 @@ static int io_close_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
* io_wq_work.flags, so initialize io_wq_work firstly.
*/
io_req_init_async(req);
- req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL;
if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -4505,6 +4504,8 @@ static int io_close(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
/* if the file has a flush method, be safe and punt to async */
if (close->put_file->f_op->flush && force_nonblock) {
+ /* not safe to cancel at this point */
+ req->work.flags |= IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL;
/* was never set, but play safe */
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NOWAIT;
/* avoid grabbing files - we don't need the files */
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 17:18 Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-01-20 2:07 ` [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL IORING_OP_CLOSE cancelation state Joseph Qi
2021-01-20 2:20 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-20 2:25 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox