From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC v2 2/5] io_uring/bpf: add stubs for bpf struct_ops
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:57:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2cd83fa47ed6e7e6c4e9207e66204e97371a37c.1749214572.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1749214572.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Add some basic helpers and definitions for implementing bpf struct_ops.
There are no callbaack yet, and registration will always fail.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 4 ++
io_uring/Kconfig | 5 ++
io_uring/Makefile | 1 +
io_uring/bpf.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
io_uring/bpf.h | 26 ++++++++++
io_uring/io_uring.c | 3 ++
6 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 io_uring/bpf.c
create mode 100644 io_uring/bpf.h
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 2922635986f5..26ee1a6f52e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
#include <linux/llist.h>
#include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
+struct io_uring_ops;
+
enum {
/*
* A hint to not wake right away but delay until there are enough of
@@ -344,6 +346,8 @@ struct io_ring_ctx {
void *cq_wait_arg;
size_t cq_wait_size;
+
+ struct io_uring_ops *bpf_ops;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/*
diff --git a/io_uring/Kconfig b/io_uring/Kconfig
index 4b949c42c0bf..b4dad9b74544 100644
--- a/io_uring/Kconfig
+++ b/io_uring/Kconfig
@@ -9,3 +9,8 @@ config IO_URING_ZCRX
depends on PAGE_POOL
depends on INET
depends on NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
+
+config IO_URING_BPF
+ def_bool y
+ depends on IO_URING
+ depends on BPF_SYSCALL && BPF_JIT && DEBUG_INFO_BTF
diff --git a/io_uring/Makefile b/io_uring/Makefile
index d97c6b51d584..58f46c0f9895 100644
--- a/io_uring/Makefile
+++ b/io_uring/Makefile
@@ -21,3 +21,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EPOLL) += epoll.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL) += napi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NET) += net.o cmd_net.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += fdinfo.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IO_URING_BPF) += bpf.o
diff --git a/io_uring/bpf.c b/io_uring/bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3096c54e4fb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/io_uring/bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+
+#include "bpf.h"
+#include "register.h"
+
+static struct io_uring_ops io_bpf_ops_stubs = {
+};
+
+static bool bpf_io_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
+ enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+{
+ if (type != BPF_READ)
+ return false;
+ if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(__u64) * MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
+ return false;
+ if (off % size != 0)
+ return false;
+
+ return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+ const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off,
+ int size)
+{
+ return -EACCES;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_io_verifier_ops = {
+ .get_func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto,
+ .is_valid_access = bpf_io_is_valid_access,
+ .btf_struct_access = bpf_io_btf_struct_access,
+};
+
+static int bpf_io_init(struct btf *btf)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_io_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static void bpf_io_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+}
+
+void io_unregister_bpf_ops(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+}
+
+static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_io_uring_ops = {
+ .verifier_ops = &bpf_io_verifier_ops,
+ .reg = bpf_io_reg,
+ .unreg = bpf_io_unreg,
+ .check_member = bpf_io_check_member,
+ .init_member = bpf_io_init_member,
+ .init = bpf_io_init,
+ .cfi_stubs = &io_bpf_ops_stubs,
+ .name = "io_uring_ops",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int __init io_uring_bpf_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_io_uring_ops, io_uring_ops);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("io_uring: Failed to register struct_ops (%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+__initcall(io_uring_bpf_init);
diff --git a/io_uring/bpf.h b/io_uring/bpf.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a61c489d306b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/io_uring/bpf.h
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#ifndef IOU_BPF_H
+#define IOU_BPF_H
+
+#include <linux/io_uring_types.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+
+#include "io_uring.h"
+
+struct io_uring_ops {
+};
+
+static inline bool io_bpf_attached(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF) && ctx->bpf_ops != NULL;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF
+void io_unregister_bpf_ops(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
+#else
+static inline void io_unregister_bpf_ops(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 9cc4d8f335a1..8f68e898d60c 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
#include "msg_ring.h"
#include "memmap.h"
#include "zcrx.h"
+#include "bpf.h"
#include "timeout.h"
#include "poll.h"
@@ -2870,6 +2871,8 @@ static __cold void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct io_tctx_node *node;
int ret;
+ io_unregister_bpf_ops(ctx);
+
/*
* If we're doing polled IO and end up having requests being
* submitted async (out-of-line), then completions can come in while
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 13:57 [RFC v2 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-06 13:57 ` [RFC v2 1/5] io_uring: add struct for state controlling cqwait Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-06 13:57 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-06-06 14:25 ` [RFC v2 2/5] io_uring/bpf: add stubs for bpf struct_ops Jens Axboe
2025-06-06 14:28 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-06 13:58 ` [RFC v2 3/5] io_uring/bpf: implement struct_ops registration Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-06 14:57 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-06 20:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-06 21:07 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-06 13:58 ` [RFC v2 4/5] io_uring/bpf: add handle events callback Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-12 2:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-12 9:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-12 14:07 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-06 13:58 ` [RFC v2 5/5] io_uring/bpf: add basic kfunc helpers Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-12 2:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-12 13:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-12 14:06 ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-13 0:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-13 16:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-13 19:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-16 20:34 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-06-06 14:38 ` [RFC v2 0/5] BPF controlled io_uring Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2cd83fa47ed6e7e6c4e9207e66204e97371a37c.1749214572.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox