[PATCH 1/4] io_uring: dont kill fasync under completion_lock

[Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>]

      CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&new->fa_lock);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
                               lock(&new->fa_lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&ctx->completion_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

Move kill_fasync() out of io_commit_cqring() to io_cqring_ev_posted(),
so it doesn't hold completion_lock while doing it. That saves from the
reported deadlock, and it's just nice to shorten the locking time and
untangle nested locks (compl_lock -> wq_head::lock).

Reported-by: syzbot+91ca3f25bd7f795f019c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ca46f314640b..00dd85acd039 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1342,11 +1342,6 @@ static void __io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 
 	/* order cqe stores with ring update */
 	smp_store_release(&rings->cq.tail, ctx->cached_cq_tail);
-
-	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
-		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
-		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
-	}
 }
 
 static void io_put_identity(struct io_uring_task *tctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
@@ -1710,6 +1705,10 @@ static void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 		wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
 	if (io_should_trigger_evfd(ctx))
 		eventfd_signal(ctx->cq_ev_fd, 1);
+	if (wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->cq_wait)) {
+		wake_up_interruptible(&ctx->cq_wait);
+		kill_fasync(&ctx->cq_fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+	}
 }
 
 /* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */
-- 
2.24.0