* [PATCH] io_uring: acquire 'mm' for task_work for SQPOLL
@ 2020-06-17 1:09 Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-06-17 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring
If we're unlucky with timing, we could be running task_work after
having dropped the memory context in the sq thread. Since dropping
the context requires a runnable task state, we cannot reliably drop
it as part of our check-for-work loop in io_sq_thread(). Instead,
abstract out the mm acquire for the sq thread into a helper, and call
it from the async task work handler.
Cc: [email protected] # v5.7
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 918f70fa34ce..1d2ae07fa14d 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4254,6 +4254,28 @@ static void io_async_queue_proc(struct file *file, struct wait_queue_head *head,
__io_queue_proc(&pt->req->apoll->poll, pt, head);
}
+static void io_sq_thread_drop_mm(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+
+ if (mm) {
+ kthread_unuse_mm(mm);
+ mmput(mm);
+ }
+}
+
+static int io_sq_thread_acquire_mm(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].needs_mm && !current->mm) {
+ if (unlikely(!mmget_not_zero(ctx->sqo_mm)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ kthread_use_mm(ctx->sqo_mm);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work);
@@ -4288,11 +4310,16 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb)
if (!canceled) {
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ if (io_sq_thread_acquire_mm(ctx, req)) {
+ io_cqring_add_event(req, -EFAULT);
+ goto end_req;
+ }
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
__io_queue_sqe(req, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
} else {
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+end_req:
req_set_fail_links(req);
io_double_put_req(req);
}
@@ -5839,11 +5866,8 @@ static int io_init_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
if (unlikely(req->opcode >= IORING_OP_LAST))
return -EINVAL;
- if (io_op_defs[req->opcode].needs_mm && !current->mm) {
- if (unlikely(!mmget_not_zero(ctx->sqo_mm)))
- return -EFAULT;
- kthread_use_mm(ctx->sqo_mm);
- }
+ if (unlikely(io_sq_thread_acquire_mm(ctx, req)))
+ return -EFAULT;
sqe_flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->flags);
/* enforce forwards compatibility on users */
@@ -5952,16 +5976,6 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
return submitted;
}
-static inline void io_sq_thread_drop_mm(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-{
- struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
-
- if (mm) {
- kthread_unuse_mm(mm);
- mmput(mm);
- }
-}
-
static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = data;
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-06-17 1:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-17 1:09 [PATCH] io_uring: acquire 'mm' for task_work for SQPOLL Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox