public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/poll: use regular CQE posting for multishot termination
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 12:08:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e837d840-4ff7-423a-a7a9-2196a7d44d26@kernel.dk> (raw)

A previous patch avoided reordering of multiple multishot requests
getting their CQEs potentiall reordered when one of them terminates, as
that last termination CQE is posted as a deferred completion rather than
directly as a CQE. This can reduce the efficiency of the batched
posting, hence was not ideal.

Provide a basic helper that poll can use for this kind of termination,
which does a normal CQE posting rather than a deferred one. With that,
the work-around where io_req_post_cqe() needs to flush deferred
completions can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

---

This removes the io_req_post_cqe() flushing, and instead puts the honus
on the poll side to provide the ordering. I've verified that this also
fixes the reported issue. The previous patch can be easily backported to
stable, so makes sense to keep that one.

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 541e65a1eebf..505959fc2de0 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -848,14 +848,6 @@ bool io_req_post_cqe(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res, u32 cflags)
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
 	bool posted;
 
-	/*
-	 * If multishot has already posted deferred completions, ensure that
-	 * those are flushed first before posting this one. If not, CQEs
-	 * could get reordered.
-	 */
-	if (!wq_list_empty(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs))
-		__io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
-
 	lockdep_assert(!io_wq_current_is_worker());
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
 
@@ -871,6 +863,23 @@ bool io_req_post_cqe(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res, u32 cflags)
 	return posted;
 }
 
+bool io_req_post_cqe_overflow(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+	bool filled;
+
+	filled = io_req_post_cqe(req, req->cqe.res, req->cqe.flags);
+	if (unlikely(!filled)) {
+		struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+
+		spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+		filled = io_cqring_event_overflow(ctx, req->cqe.user_data,
+					req->cqe.res, req->cqe.flags, 0, 0);
+		spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+	}
+
+	return filled;
+}
+
 static void io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index e4050b2d0821..d2d4bf7c3b29 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ void io_req_defer_failed(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res);
 bool io_post_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags);
 void io_add_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags);
 bool io_req_post_cqe(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res, u32 cflags);
+bool io_req_post_cqe_overflow(struct io_kiocb *req);
 void __io_commit_cqring_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
 
 struct file *io_file_get_normal(struct io_kiocb *req, int fd);
diff --git a/io_uring/poll.c b/io_uring/poll.c
index 8eb744eb9f4c..af8e3d4f6f1f 100644
--- a/io_uring/poll.c
+++ b/io_uring/poll.c
@@ -312,6 +312,13 @@ static int io_poll_check_events(struct io_kiocb *req, io_tw_token_t tw)
 	return IOU_POLL_NO_ACTION;
 }
 
+static void io_poll_req_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, io_tw_token_t tw)
+{
+	if (io_req_post_cqe_overflow(req))
+		req->flags |= REQ_F_CQE_SKIP;
+	io_req_task_complete(req, tw);
+}
+
 void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, io_tw_token_t tw)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -349,7 +356,7 @@ void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, io_tw_token_t tw)
 		io_tw_lock(req->ctx, tw);
 
 		if (ret == IOU_POLL_REMOVE_POLL_USE_RES)
-			io_req_task_complete(req, tw);
+			io_poll_req_complete(req, tw);
 		else if (ret == IOU_POLL_DONE || ret == IOU_POLL_REISSUE)
 			io_req_task_submit(req, tw);
 		else
-- 
Jens Axboe


             reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 18:08 Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-05-07 20:53 ` [PATCH] io_uring/poll: use regular CQE posting for multishot termination Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-07 23:11   ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-08  8:11     ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e837d840-4ff7-423a-a7a9-2196a7d44d26@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox