* [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: remove opcode check on ltimeout kill
2020-10-22 15:43 [PATCH 0/4] clean up linked timeouts Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-10-22 15:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] io_uring: dont adjust LINK_HEAD in cancel ltimeout Pavel Begunkov
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-10-22 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring
__io_kill_linked_timeout() already checks for REQ_F_LTIMEOUT_ACTIVE and
it's set only for linked timeouts. No need to verify next request's
opcode.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 29170bbdd708..8d9a017b564a 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1872,8 +1872,7 @@ static bool __io_kill_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
if (list_empty(&req->link_list))
return false;
link = list_first_entry(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, link_list);
- if (link->opcode != IORING_OP_LINK_TIMEOUT)
- return false;
+
/*
* Can happen if a linked timeout fired and link had been like
* req -> link t-out -> link t-out [-> ...]
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] io_uring: dont adjust LINK_HEAD in cancel ltimeout
2020-10-22 15:43 [PATCH 0/4] clean up linked timeouts Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: remove opcode check on ltimeout kill Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-10-22 15:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] io_uring: always clear LINK_TIMEOUT after cancel Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: don't defer put of cancelled ltimeout Pavel Begunkov
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-10-22 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring
An armed linked timeout can never be a head of a link, so we don't need
to clear REQ_F_LINK_HEAD for it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 8d9a017b564a..5e327d620b8f 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1856,7 +1856,6 @@ static bool io_link_cancel_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
if (ret != -1) {
io_cqring_fill_event(req, -ECANCELED);
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
- req->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_HEAD;
io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
return true;
}
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] io_uring: always clear LINK_TIMEOUT after cancel
2020-10-22 15:43 [PATCH 0/4] clean up linked timeouts Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: remove opcode check on ltimeout kill Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] io_uring: dont adjust LINK_HEAD in cancel ltimeout Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-10-22 15:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: don't defer put of cancelled ltimeout Pavel Begunkov
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-10-22 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring
Move REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT clearing out of __io_kill_linked_timeout()
because it might return early and leave the flag set. It's not a
problem, but may be confusing.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 5e327d620b8f..d9ac45f850be 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1881,7 +1881,6 @@ static bool __io_kill_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
list_del_init(&link->link_list);
wake_ev = io_link_cancel_timeout(link);
- req->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT;
return wake_ev;
}
@@ -1893,6 +1892,7 @@ static void io_kill_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
wake_ev = __io_kill_linked_timeout(req);
+ req->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
if (wake_ev)
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: don't defer put of cancelled ltimeout
2020-10-22 15:43 [PATCH 0/4] clean up linked timeouts Pavel Begunkov
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-22 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] io_uring: always clear LINK_TIMEOUT after cancel Pavel Begunkov
@ 2020-10-22 15:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2020-10-22 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, io-uring
Inline io_link_cancel_timeout() and __io_kill_linked_timeout() into
io_kill_linked_timeout(). That allows to easily move a put of a cancelled
linked timeout out of completion_lock and to not deferring it. It is also
much more readable when not scattered across three different functions.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index d9ac45f850be..5a0fa2889fcb 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1846,57 +1846,39 @@ static void __io_free_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
}
-static bool io_link_cancel_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
+static void io_kill_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
- struct io_timeout_data *io = req->async_data;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- int ret;
-
- ret = hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&io->timer);
- if (ret != -1) {
- io_cqring_fill_event(req, -ECANCELED);
- io_commit_cqring(ctx);
- io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
- return true;
- }
-
- return false;
-}
-
-static bool __io_kill_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
-{
struct io_kiocb *link;
- bool wake_ev;
-
- if (list_empty(&req->link_list))
- return false;
- link = list_first_entry(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb, link_list);
+ bool cancelled = false;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+ link = list_first_entry_or_null(&req->link_list, struct io_kiocb,
+ link_list);
/*
* Can happen if a linked timeout fired and link had been like
* req -> link t-out -> link t-out [-> ...]
*/
- if (!(link->flags & REQ_F_LTIMEOUT_ACTIVE))
- return false;
-
- list_del_init(&link->link_list);
- wake_ev = io_link_cancel_timeout(link);
- return wake_ev;
-}
-
-static void io_kill_linked_timeout(struct io_kiocb *req)
-{
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- unsigned long flags;
- bool wake_ev;
+ if (link && (link->flags & REQ_F_LTIMEOUT_ACTIVE)) {
+ struct io_timeout_data *io = link->async_data;
+ int ret;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
- wake_ev = __io_kill_linked_timeout(req);
+ list_del_init(&link->link_list);
+ ret = hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&io->timer);
+ if (ret != -1) {
+ io_cqring_fill_event(link, -ECANCELED);
+ io_commit_cqring(ctx);
+ cancelled = true;
+ }
+ }
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_LINK_TIMEOUT;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
- if (wake_ev)
+ if (cancelled) {
io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
+ io_put_req(link);
+ }
}
static struct io_kiocb *io_req_link_next(struct io_kiocb *req)
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread