public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>, Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] io_uring/cmd: fix tw <-> issue_flags conversion
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:25:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zfelt6mbVA0moyq6@fedora>

On 3/17/24 8:23 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:41:47AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> !IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED does not translate to availability of the deferred
>> completion infra, IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER does, that what we should
>> pass and look for to use io_req_complete_defer() and other variants.
>>
>> Luckily, it's not a real problem as two wrongs actually made it right,
>> at least as far as io_uring_cmd_work() goes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/eb08e72e837106963bc7bc7dccfd93d646cc7f36.1710514702.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
>> index f197e8c22965..ec38a8d4836d 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
>> @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable);
>>  static void io_uring_cmd_work(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_tw_state *ts)
>>  {
>>  	struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_uring_cmd);
>> -	unsigned issue_flags = ts->locked ? 0 : IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED;
>> +	unsigned issue_flags = IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED;
>> +
>> +	/* locked task_work executor checks the deffered list completion */
>> +	if (ts->locked)
>> +		issue_flags = IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER;
>>  
>>  	ioucmd->task_work_cb(ioucmd, issue_flags);
>>  }
>> @@ -100,7 +104,9 @@ void io_uring_cmd_done(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd, ssize_t ret, ssize_t res2,
>>  	if (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL) {
>>  		/* order with io_iopoll_req_issued() checking ->iopoll_complete */
>>  		smp_store_release(&req->iopoll_completed, 1);
>> -	} else if (!(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED)) {
>> +	} else if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER) {
>> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED))
>> +			return;
>>  		io_req_complete_defer(req);
>>  	} else {
>>  		req->io_task_work.func = io_req_task_complete;
> 
> 'git-bisect' shows the reported warning starts from this patch.

That does make sense, as probably:

+	/* locked task_work executor checks the deffered list completion */
+	if (ts->locked)
+		issue_flags = IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER;

this assumption isn't true, and that would mess with the task management
(which is in your oops).

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18  0:41 [PATCH v2 00/14] remove aux CQE caches Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] io_uring/cmd: kill one issue_flags to tw conversion Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] io_uring/cmd: fix tw <-> issue_flags conversion Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  2:23   ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  2:25     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-03-18  2:32       ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  2:40         ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  2:43           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  2:46             ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  2:47           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  3:11             ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  3:24               ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  6:59               ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 11:45                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] io_uring/cmd: make io_uring_cmd_done irq safe Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  8:10   ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 11:50     ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 11:59       ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 12:46         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 13:09           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] io_uring/cmd: introduce io_uring_cmd_complete Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] ublk: don't hard code IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  8:16   ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 12:52     ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 13:37       ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 14:32         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 14:39           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 14:34       ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 15:08         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 15:16           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] nvme/io_uring: " Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 13:26   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-03-18 13:38     ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] io_uring/rw: avoid punting to io-wq directly Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] io_uring: force tw ctx locking Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] io_uring: remove struct io_tw_state::locked Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] io_uring: refactor io_fill_cqe_req_aux Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] io_uring: get rid of intermediate aux cqe caches Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] io_uring: remove current check from complete_post Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] io_uring: refactor io_req_complete_post() Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] io_uring: clean up io_lockdep_assert_cq_locked Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox