From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]>,
Daniel Harding <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] lxc-stop hang on 5.17.x kernels
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:22:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/16/22 12:17 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Pavel, I had actually just started a draft email with the same theory
>>> (although you stated it much more clearly than I could have). I'm
>>> working on debugging the LXC side, but I'm pretty sure the issue is
>>> due to LXC using blocking reads and getting stuck exactly as you
>>> describe. If I can confirm this, I'll go ahead and mark this
>>> regression as invalid and file an issue with LXC. Thanks for your help
>>> and patience.
>>
>> Yes, it does appear that was the problem. The attach POC patch against
>> LXC fixes the hang. The kernel is working as intended.
>>
>> #regzbot invalid: userspace programming error
>
> Hmmm, not sure if I like this. So yes, this might be a bug in LXC, but
> afaics it's a bug that was exposed by kernel change in 5.17 (correct me
> if I'm wrong!). The problem thus still qualifies as a kernel regression
> that normally needs to be fixed, as can be seen my some of the quotes
> from Linus in this file:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/handling-regressions.html
Sorry, but that's really BS in this particularly case. This could always
have triggered, it's the way multishot works. Will we count eg timing
changes as potential regressions, because an application relied on
something there? That does not make it ABI.
In general I agree with Linus on this, a change in behavior breaking
something should be investigated and figured out (and reverted, if need
be). This is not that.
--
Jens Axboe
I
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-02 13:17 [REGRESSION] lxc-stop hang on 5.17.x kernels Daniel Harding
2022-05-02 13:26 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-02 13:36 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-02 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-02 17:00 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-02 17:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-02 18:49 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-02 23:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-03 7:37 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-03 14:14 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-04 6:54 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-15 8:20 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-05-15 18:34 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-16 12:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-16 13:25 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-16 13:57 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-16 15:13 ` Daniel Harding
2022-05-16 18:13 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-17 8:19 ` Christian Brauner
2022-05-17 10:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-16 18:17 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-05-16 18:22 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-05-16 18:34 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-05-16 18:39 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-16 19:07 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-05-16 19:14 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox