From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Felix Moessbauer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: respect cgroup cpusets
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:53:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 9/10/24 8:33 AM, Felix Moessbauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this series continues the affinity cleanup work started in
> io_uring/sqpoll. It has been tested against the liburing testsuite
> (make runtests), whereby the read-mshot test always fails:
>
> Running test read-mshot.t
> Buffer ring register failed -22
> test_inc 0 0 failed
> Test read-mshot.t failed with ret 1
>
> However, this test also fails on a non-patched linux-next @
> bc83b4d1f086.
That sounds very odd... What liburing are you using? On old kernels
where provided buffer rings aren't available the test should just skip,
new ones it should pass. Only thing I can think of is that your liburing
repo isn't current?
> The test wq-aff.t succeeds if at least cpu 0,1 are in the set and
> fails otherwise. This is expected, as the test wants to pin on these
> cpus. I'll send a patch for liburing to skip that test in case this
> pre-condition is not met.
>
> Regarding backporting: I would like to backport these patches to 6.1 as
> well, as they affect our realtime applications. However, in-between 6.1
> and next there is a major change da64d6db3bd3 ("io_uring: One wqe per
> wq"), which makes the backport tricky. While I don't think we want to
> backport this change, would a dedicated backport of the two pinning
> patches for the old multi-queue implementation have a chance to be accepted?
Let's not backport that patch, just because it's pretty invasive. It's
fine to have a separate backport patch of them for -stable, in this case
we'll have one version for stable kernels new enough to have that
change, and one for older versions. Thankfully not that many to care
about.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 14:33 [PATCH 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: respect cgroup cpusets Felix Moessbauer
2024-09-10 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring/io-wq: do not allow pinning outside of cpuset Felix Moessbauer
2024-09-10 14:55 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-10 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring/io-wq: limit io poller cpuset to ambient one Felix Moessbauer
2024-09-10 14:55 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-10 14:53 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-09-10 15:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] io_uring/io-wq: respect cgroup cpusets MOESSBAUER, Felix
2024-09-10 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-10 15:37 ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2024-09-10 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox