From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974FAC11F65 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7366D61580 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234982AbhF3UYd (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:24:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234888AbhF3UY1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:24:27 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A003C061756 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id g5so1134795iox.11 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:21:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Z4+OkN6FlBIjlpyyrT+0IF+5jz/Pi/fm32YjnWSb6g=; b=Ghf4etGAJtySqxh/3scoTY0v1aCMerzeRpn2JRJ9gRxGOPMZ1lvYditCh5vM+p8MAk TK57ynI6Lt4iwCGSUzysoCUw39HfPKicuTSwMkkExkntAOtSlzeeH7TvUSMbyHkUdDuO kiSgDOmcenXQ3YjK34O4kwZ9hg/dDq9bchR+BZKnemBP8rK7s/AtAfWc+soaoklMWQa3 +WsoE3mru3ISUAGggQzbzPBx3NH+B8uROhaEDyJUIwn63n7TiiboI5vqnmLRHWYWCEaA C5SOxbkc0/67/wTfutGGOTldQQzCs4fS73B+qJYGT620utMGNirzDr70pH1K/jzXjYOe 6wYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Z4+OkN6FlBIjlpyyrT+0IF+5jz/Pi/fm32YjnWSb6g=; b=enRjArfglPHiwkOgZUH31lz2izf+b+NrtU4swzosxRQIOaouSXf5vLuGkfYRnWxcEw U2wm9ey0qRLATL2KqaRmouNIQQ2LOoVP6FJsE+/D04igr5M+CZtm7WNmOpjYUzChblzi KxaHQmHeuxWx0W+LADapI+Uafouc3fx9APYdJIQZhxNQo5LqFZVAA21dc53F4VwW1/sW PVVvvqSXRrl7hfXvhiJmuwlmPRAuXJcQD6BMCX2PmMbKCAbasu4+YmI2S0hmft0VIRNN WWVtnMfrsy9kwCEhJ211uOM8EHpRipKvcvpscNFz/amKNcohl7Ah0X0cip4YSFuF6A8S ft+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rfw8rg+5+0l+Zx+BQu/nWdXWwdkbUmj7+EH1kdwPyrbhPoRdx f6BEB8FdbNvMNN0qX0oM1DD/siadnreYqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpSLLAAE2CPOLgdVfI1n0qbbnd5v8VS4O8Ao+NZVEd6KulztPuHrxnxPspPAiuwY25+/Dnjw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1243:: with SMTP id o3mr9224116iou.13.1625084516006; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.134] ([198.8.77.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm8672899ioy.46.2021.06.30.13.21.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.14-rc1 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , Dmitry Kadashev , io-uring References: <00f21ea0-2f38-f554-63e9-ef07e806a0cd@kernel.dk> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:21:54 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 6/30/21 2:18 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 1:14 PM Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> I think you're being very unfair here, last release was pretty >> uneventful, and of course 5.12 was a bit too exciting with the >> thread changes, but that was both expected and a necessary evil. > > The last one may have been uneventful, but I really want to keep it > that way. We certainly share that goal. > And the threading changes were an improvement overall, but they were > by no means the first time io_uring was flaky and had issues. It has > caused a _lot_ of churn over the years. In some ways that was almost inevitable with treading new waters, but I'm hopeful that we're way beyond the hump on that. I totally agree that it should not be disruptive to core code, and I'm definitely fine rejecting those bits to avoid having that be the case. We'll get it sorted. -- Jens Axboe