From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: fix req->apoll_events
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:28:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0aef40399ba75b1a4d2c2e85e6e8fd93c02fc6e4.1655814213.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On 6/21/22 13:25, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> apoll_events should be set once in the beginning of poll arming just as
> poll->events and not change after. However, currently io_uring resets it
> on each __io_poll_execute() for no clear reason. There is also a place
> in __io_arm_poll_handler() where we add EPOLLONESHOT to downgrade a
> multishot, but forget to do the same thing with ->apoll_events, which is
> buggy.
>
> Fixes: 81459350d581e ("io_uring: cache req->apoll->events in req->cflags")
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 87c65a358678..ebda9a565fc0 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -6954,7 +6954,8 @@ static void io_apoll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
> io_req_complete_failed(req, ret);
> }
>
> -static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask, __poll_t events)
> +static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask,
> + __poll_t __maybe_unused events)
Killing @events would add extra rebase conflicts, so left it here and will
send a clean up for 5.20.
> {
> req->cqe.res = mask;
> /*
> @@ -6963,7 +6964,6 @@ static void __io_poll_execute(struct io_kiocb *req, int mask, __poll_t events)
> * CPU. We want to avoid pulling in req->apoll->events for that
> * case.
> */
> - req->apoll_events = events;
> if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
> req->io_task_work.func = io_poll_task_func;
> else
> @@ -7114,6 +7114,8 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
> io_init_poll_iocb(poll, mask, io_poll_wake);
> poll->file = req->file;
>
> + req->apoll_events = poll->events;
> +
> ipt->pt._key = mask;
> ipt->req = req;
> ipt->error = 0;
> @@ -7144,8 +7146,10 @@ static int __io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req,
>
> if (mask) {
> /* can't multishot if failed, just queue the event we've got */
> - if (unlikely(ipt->error || !ipt->nr_entries))
> + if (unlikely(ipt->error || !ipt->nr_entries)) {
> poll->events |= EPOLLONESHOT;
> + req->apoll_events |= EPOLLONESHOT;
> + }
> __io_poll_execute(req, mask, poll->events);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -7392,7 +7396,7 @@ static int io_poll_add_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe
> return -EINVAL;
>
> io_req_set_refcount(req);
> - req->apoll_events = poll->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
> + poll->events = io_poll_parse_events(sqe, flags);
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-21 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 12:25 [PATCH 5.19] io_uring: fix req->apoll_events Pavel Begunkov
2022-06-21 12:28 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-06-21 13:28 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-21 13:49 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox