From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Bijan Mottahedeh <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: call statx directly
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:59:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/22/20 10:31 PM, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote:
> v1 -> v2
>
> - Separate statx and open in io_kiocb
> - Remove external declarations for unused statx interfaces
>
> This patch set is a fix for the liburing statx test failure.
>
> The test fails with a "Miscompare between io_uring and statx" error
> because the statx system call path has additional processing in vfs_statx():
>
> stat->result_mask |= STATX_MNT_ID;
> if (path.mnt->mnt_root == path.dentry)
> stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT;
> stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT;
>
> which then results in different result_mask values.
>
> Allowing the system call to be invoked directly simplifies the io_uring
> interface and avoids potential future incompatibilities. I'm not sure
> if there was other reasoning fort not doing so initially.
>
> One issue I cannot account for is the difference in "used" memory reported
> by free(1) after running the statx a large (10000) number of times.
>
> The difference is significant ~100k and doesn't really change after
> dropping caches.
>
> I enabled memory leak detection and couldn't see anything related to the test.
>
> Bijan Mottahedeh (4):
> io_uring: add io_statx structure
> statx: allow system call to be invoked from io_uring
> io_uring: call statx directly
> statx: hide interfaces no longer used by io_uring
>
> fs/internal.h | 4 ++--
> fs/io_uring.c | 72 +++++++++++++++--------------------------------------------
> fs/stat.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
Thanks, this looks better. For a bit of history, the initial attempt was
to do the statx without async offload if we could do so without blocking.
Without that, we may as well simplify it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-23 4:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: call statx directly Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23 4:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] io_uring: add io_statx structure Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23 4:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] statx: allow system call to be invoked from io_uring Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23 4:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] io_uring: call statx directly Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-23 4:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] statx: hide interfaces no longer used by io_uring Bijan Mottahedeh
2020-05-26 22:59 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-05-26 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: call statx directly Clay Harris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox