From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: xiao lin <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/io_uring.c: fix null ptr deference in io_send_recvmsg()
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:55:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 8/4/20 11:15 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/4/20 11:02 AM, xiao lin wrote:
>> 在 2020年8月4日星期二,Jens Axboe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 写道:
>>
>> On 8/4/20 7:18 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> > On 04/08/2020 15:56, Liu Yong wrote:
>> >> In io_send_recvmsg(), there is no check for the req->file.
>> >> User can change the opcode from IORING_OP_NOP to IORING_OP_SENDMSG
>> >> through competition after the io_req_set_file().
>> >
>> > After sqe->opcode is read and copied in io_init_req(), it only uses
>> > in-kernel req->opcode. Also, io_init_req() should check for req->file
>> > NULL, so shouldn't happen after.
>> >
>> > Do you have a reproducer? What kernel version did you use?
>>
>> Was looking at this too, and I'm guessing this is some 5.4 based kernel.
>> Unfortunately the oops doesn't include that information.
>
>> Sorry, I forgot to mention that the kernel version I am using is 5.4.55.
>
> I think there are two options here:
>
> 1) Backport the series that ensured we only read those important bits once
> 2) Make s->sqe a full sqe, and memcpy it in
Something like this should close the ->opcode re-read for 5.4-stable.
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index e0200406765c..8bb5e19b7c3c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ struct sqe_submit {
bool has_user;
bool needs_lock;
bool needs_fixed_file;
+ u8 opcode;
};
/*
@@ -505,7 +506,7 @@ static inline void io_queue_async_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
int rw = 0;
if (req->submit.sqe) {
- switch (req->submit.sqe->opcode) {
+ switch (req->submit.opcode) {
case IORING_OP_WRITEV:
case IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED:
rw = !(req->rw.ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT);
@@ -1254,23 +1255,15 @@ static int io_import_fixed(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int rw,
}
static ssize_t io_import_iovec(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int rw,
- const struct sqe_submit *s, struct iovec **iovec,
+ struct io_kiocb *req, struct iovec **iovec,
struct iov_iter *iter)
{
- const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = s->sqe;
+ const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe = req->submit.sqe;
void __user *buf = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
size_t sqe_len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
u8 opcode;
- /*
- * We're reading ->opcode for the second time, but the first read
- * doesn't care whether it's _FIXED or not, so it doesn't matter
- * whether ->opcode changes concurrently. The first read does care
- * about whether it is a READ or a WRITE, so we don't trust this read
- * for that purpose and instead let the caller pass in the read/write
- * flag.
- */
- opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
+ opcode = req->submit.opcode;
if (opcode == IORING_OP_READ_FIXED ||
opcode == IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED) {
ssize_t ret = io_import_fixed(ctx, rw, sqe, iter);
@@ -1278,7 +1271,7 @@ static ssize_t io_import_iovec(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int rw,
return ret;
}
- if (!s->has_user)
+ if (!req->submit.has_user)
return -EFAULT;
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
@@ -1425,7 +1418,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,
if (unlikely(!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ)))
return -EBADF;
- ret = io_import_iovec(req->ctx, READ, s, &iovec, &iter);
+ ret = io_import_iovec(req->ctx, READ, req, &iovec, &iter);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -1490,7 +1483,7 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct sqe_submit *s,
if (unlikely(!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)))
return -EBADF;
- ret = io_import_iovec(req->ctx, WRITE, s, &iovec, &iter);
+ ret = io_import_iovec(req->ctx, WRITE, req, &iovec, &iter);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -2109,15 +2102,14 @@ static int io_req_defer(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
static int __io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
const struct sqe_submit *s, bool force_nonblock)
{
- int ret, opcode;
+ int ret;
req->user_data = READ_ONCE(s->sqe->user_data);
if (unlikely(s->index >= ctx->sq_entries))
return -EINVAL;
- opcode = READ_ONCE(s->sqe->opcode);
- switch (opcode) {
+ switch (req->submit.opcode) {
case IORING_OP_NOP:
ret = io_nop(req, req->user_data);
break;
@@ -2181,10 +2173,10 @@ static int __io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
return 0;
}
-static struct async_list *io_async_list_from_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
- const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
+static struct async_list *io_async_list_from_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct io_kiocb *req)
{
- switch (sqe->opcode) {
+ switch (req->submit.opcode) {
case IORING_OP_READV:
case IORING_OP_READ_FIXED:
return &ctx->pending_async[READ];
@@ -2196,12 +2188,10 @@ static struct async_list *io_async_list_from_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
}
}
-static inline bool io_sqe_needs_user(const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
+static inline bool io_req_needs_user(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
- u8 opcode = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
-
- return !(opcode == IORING_OP_READ_FIXED ||
- opcode == IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED);
+ return !(req->submit.opcode == IORING_OP_READ_FIXED ||
+ req->submit.opcode == IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED);
}
static void io_sq_wq_submit_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -2217,7 +2207,7 @@ static void io_sq_wq_submit_work(struct work_struct *work)
int ret;
old_cred = override_creds(ctx->creds);
- async_list = io_async_list_from_sqe(ctx, req->submit.sqe);
+ async_list = io_async_list_from_req(ctx, req);
allow_kernel_signal(SIGINT);
restart:
@@ -2239,7 +2229,7 @@ static void io_sq_wq_submit_work(struct work_struct *work)
}
ret = 0;
- if (io_sqe_needs_user(sqe) && !cur_mm) {
+ if (io_req_needs_user(req) && !cur_mm) {
if (!mmget_not_zero(ctx->sqo_mm)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
} else {
@@ -2387,11 +2377,9 @@ static bool io_add_to_prev_work(struct async_list *list, struct io_kiocb *req)
return ret;
}
-static bool io_op_needs_file(const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
+static bool io_op_needs_file(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
- int op = READ_ONCE(sqe->opcode);
-
- switch (op) {
+ switch (req->submit.opcode) {
case IORING_OP_NOP:
case IORING_OP_POLL_REMOVE:
case IORING_OP_TIMEOUT:
@@ -2419,7 +2407,7 @@ static int io_req_set_file(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, const struct sqe_submit *s,
*/
req->sequence = s->sequence;
- if (!io_op_needs_file(s->sqe))
+ if (!io_op_needs_file(req))
return 0;
if (flags & IOSQE_FIXED_FILE) {
@@ -2460,7 +2448,7 @@ static int __io_queue_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
s->sqe = sqe_copy;
memcpy(&req->submit, s, sizeof(*s));
- list = io_async_list_from_sqe(ctx, s->sqe);
+ list = io_async_list_from_req(ctx, req);
if (!io_add_to_prev_work(list, req)) {
if (list)
atomic_inc(&list->cnt);
@@ -2582,7 +2570,7 @@ static void io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct sqe_submit *s,
req->user_data = s->sqe->user_data;
#if defined(CONFIG_NET)
- switch (READ_ONCE(s->sqe->opcode)) {
+ switch (req->submit.opcode) {
case IORING_OP_SENDMSG:
case IORING_OP_RECVMSG:
spin_lock(¤t->fs->lock);
@@ -2697,6 +2685,7 @@ static bool io_get_sqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct sqe_submit *s)
if (head < ctx->sq_entries) {
s->index = head;
s->sqe = &ctx->sq_sqes[head];
+ s->opcode = READ_ONCE(s->sqe->opcode);
s->sequence = ctx->cached_sq_head;
ctx->cached_sq_head++;
return true;
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-04 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200804125637.GA22088@ubuntu>
2020-08-04 13:18 ` [PATCH] fs/io_uring.c: fix null ptr deference in io_send_recvmsg() Pavel Begunkov
2020-08-04 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CAGAoTxzadSphnE2aLsFKS04TjTKYVq2uLFgH9dvLPwWiyqEGEQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-08-04 17:15 ` Jens Axboe
2020-08-04 21:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-08-05 3:40 ` Liu Yong
2020-08-05 4:10 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox