From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add a helper for poll clean
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 10:29:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 5/7/22 07:43, Hao Xu wrote:
> 在 2022/5/7 上午12:22, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
>> On 5/6/22 08:01, Hao Xu wrote:
>>> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Add a helper for poll clean, it will be used in the multishot accept in
>>> the later patches.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> fs/io_uring.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> index d33777575faf..0a83ecc457d1 100644
>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> @@ -5711,6 +5711,23 @@ static int io_accept_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +static inline void __io_poll_clean(struct io_kiocb *req)
>>> +{
>>> + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>>> +
>>> + io_poll_remove_entries(req);
>>> + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>>> + hash_del(&req->hash_node);
>>> + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#define REQ_F_APOLL_MULTI_POLLED (REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT | REQ_F_POLLED)
>>> +static inline void io_poll_clean(struct io_kiocb *req)
>>> +{
>>> + if ((req->flags & REQ_F_APOLL_MULTI_POLLED) == REQ_F_APOLL_MULTI_POLLED)
>>
>> So it triggers for apoll multishot only when REQ_F_POLLED is _not_ set,
>> but if it's not set it did never go through arm_poll / etc. and there is
>> nothing to clean up. What is the catch?
>
> No, it is triggered for apoll multishot only when REQ_F_POLLED is set..
Ok, see it now, probably confused REQ_F_APOLL_MULTI_POLLED on the right
hand side with something else
>> btw, don't see the function used in this patch, better to add it later
>> or at least mark with attribute unused, or some may get build failures.
> Gotcha.
>>
>>
>>> + __io_poll_clean(req);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int io_accept(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
>>> {
>>> struct io_accept *accept = &req->accept;
>>> @@ -6041,17 +6058,13 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
>>> static void io_apoll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked)
>>> {
>>> - struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>>> int ret;
>>> ret = io_poll_check_events(req, locked);
>>> if (ret > 0)
>>> return;
>>> - io_poll_remove_entries(req);
>>> - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>>> - hash_del(&req->hash_node);
>>> - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
>>> + __io_poll_clean(req);
>>> if (!ret)
>>> io_req_task_submit(req, locked);
>>
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-07 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 7:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2022-05-06 7:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: add IORING_ACCEPT_MULTISHOT for accept Hao Xu
2022-05-06 14:32 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 4:05 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 7:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: add REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT for requests Hao Xu
2022-05-06 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: let fast poll support multishot Hao Xu
2022-05-06 17:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-06 22:02 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 6:32 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-07 9:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-07 7:08 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-07 9:47 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-07 11:06 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 18:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 7:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: add a helper for poll clean Hao Xu
2022-05-06 11:04 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 12:47 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 6:37 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 16:22 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-07 6:43 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-07 9:29 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-05-06 7:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept Hao Xu
2022-05-06 14:42 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 9:13 ` Hao Xu
2022-05-06 20:50 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 7:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] fast poll multishot mode Hao Xu
2022-05-06 14:18 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 16:01 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-06 16:03 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 22:23 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-06 23:26 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 2:33 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 3:08 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-07 16:01 ` Hao Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox