From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: io-uring <[email protected]>
Cc: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v2] io_uring/net: cache provided buffer group value for multishot receives
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 07:10:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
If we're using ring provided buffers with multishot receive, and we end
up doing an io-wq based issue at some points that also needs to select
a buffer, we'll lose the initially assigned buffer group as
io_ring_buffer_select() correctly clears the buffer group list as the
issue isn't serialized by the ctx uring_lock. This is fine for normal
receives as the request puts the buffer and finishes, but for multishot,
we will re-arm and do further receives. On the next trigger for this
multishot receive, the receive will try and pick from a buffer group
whose value is the same as the buffer ID of the las receive. That is
obviously incorrect, and will result in a premature -ENOUFS error for
the receive even if we had available buffers in the correct group.
Cache the buffer group value at prep time, so we can restore it for
future receives. This only needs doing for the above mentioned case, but
just do it by default to keep it easier to read.
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: b3fdea6ecb55 ("io_uring: multishot recv")
Fixes: 9bb66906f23e ("io_uring: support multishot in recvmsg")
Cc: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
v2 - add buf group restore to io_recv_prep_retry (Dylan)
diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index fbc34a7c2743..90326b279965 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct io_sr_msg {
u16 flags;
/* initialised and used only by !msg send variants */
u16 addr_len;
+ u16 buf_group;
void __user *addr;
/* used only for send zerocopy */
struct io_kiocb *notif;
@@ -580,6 +581,15 @@ int io_recvmsg_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_RECV && sr->len)
return -EINVAL;
req->flags |= REQ_F_APOLL_MULTISHOT;
+ /*
+ * Store the buffer group for this multishot receive separately,
+ * as if we end up doing an io-wq based issue that selects a
+ * buffer, it has to be committed immediately and that will
+ * clear ->buf_list. This means we lose the link to the buffer
+ * list, and the eventual buffer put on completion then cannot
+ * restore it.
+ */
+ sr->buf_group = req->buf_index;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
@@ -596,6 +606,7 @@ static inline void io_recv_prep_retry(struct io_kiocb *req)
sr->done_io = 0;
sr->len = 0; /* get from the provided buffer */
+ req->buf_index = sr->buf_group;
}
/*
--
Jens Axboe
reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox