From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 0/3] io_uring support for automatic buffers
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:21:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
And this got botched too, really not my morning. 2b posted with the
right subject line, and the right patches too...
On 2/25/20 9:19 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> With the poll retry based async IO patchset I posted last week, the one
> big missing thing for me was the ability to have automatic buffer
> selection. Generally applications that handle tons of sockets like to
> poll for activity on them, then issue IO when they become ready. This is
> of course at least two system calls, but it also means that it provides
> an application a chance to manage how many IO buffers it needs. With the
> io_uring based polled IO, the application need only issue an
> IORING_OP_RECV (for example, to receive socket data), it doesn't need to
> poll at all. However, this means that the application no longer has an
> opportune moment to select how many IO buffers to keep in flight, it has
> to be equal to what it currently has pending.
>
> I had originally intended to use BPF to provide some means of buffer
> selection, but I had a hard time imagining how life times of the buffer
> could be managed through that. I had a false start today, but Andres
> suggested a nifty approach that also solves the life time issue.
>
> Basically the application registers buffers with the kernel. Each buffer
> is registered with a given group ID, and buffer ID. The buffers are
> organized by group ID, and the application selects a buffer pool based
> on this group ID. One use case might be to group by size. There's an
> opcode for this, IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFERS.
>
> IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFERS takes a start address, length of a buffer, and
> number of buffers. It also provides a group ID with which these buffers
> should be associated, and a starting buffer ID. The buffers are then
> added, and the buffer ID is incremented by 1 for each buffer.
>
> With that, when doing the same IORING_OP_RECV, no buffer is passed in
> with the request. Instead, it's flagged with IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT, and
> sqe->buf_group is filled in with a valid group ID. When the kernel can
> satisfy the receive, a buffer is selected from the specified group ID
> pool. If none are available, the IO is terminated with -ENOBUFS. On
> success, the buffer ID is passed back through the (CQE) completion
> event. This tells the application what specific buffer was used.
>
> A buffer can be used only once. On completion, the application may
> choose to free it, or register it again with IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFER.
>
> Patches can also be found in the below repo:
>
> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=io_uring-buf-select
>
> and they are obviously layered on top of the poll retry rework.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Cleanup address space
> - Fix locking for async offload issue
> - Add lockdep annotation for uring_lock
> - Verify sqe fields on PROVIDE_BUFFERS prep
> - Fix send/recv kbuf leak on import failure
> - Fix send/recv error handling on -ENOBUFS
> - Change IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFER to PROVIDE_BUFFERS, and allow multiple
> contig buffers in one call
>
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 16:19 [PATCHSET v2 0/3] io_uring support for automatic buffers Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFER Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: buffer registration infrastructure Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: add IORING_OP_PROVIDE_BUFFERS Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: support buffer selection Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:21 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-25 16:04 [PATCHSET v2 0/3] io_uring support for automatic buffers Jens Axboe
2020-02-25 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox