From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] io_uring: reissue in case -EAGAIN is returned after io issue returns
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:20:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 4/3/22 5:45 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> -EAGAIN still may return after io issue returns, and REQ_F_REISSUE is
> set in io_complete_rw_iopoll(), but the req never gets chance to be handled.
> io_iopoll_check doesn't handle this situation, and io hang can be caused.
>
> Current dm io polling may return -EAGAIN after bio submission is
> returned, also blk-throttle might trigger this situation too.
I don't think this is necessarily safe. Handling REQ_F_ISSUE from within
the issue path is fine, as the request hasn't been submitted yet and
hence we know that passed in structs are still stable. Once you hit it
when polling for it, the io_uring_enter() call to submit requests has
potentially already returned, and now we're in a second call where we
are polling for requests. If we're doing eg an IORING_OP_READV, the
original iovec may no longer be valid and we cannot safely re-import
data associated with it.
Hence I don't think the patch is safe and we cannot reliably handle this
scenario. dm would need to retry internally for this.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-03 11:45 [RFC PATCH] io_uring: reissue in case -EAGAIN is returned after io issue returns Ming Lei
2022-04-04 16:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-06 2:09 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-06 16:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2022-04-06 2:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2022-04-06 3:57 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-06 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-06 13:21 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-06 16:38 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox