From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing v1 1/7] liburing.h: Export `__io_uring_flush_sq()` function
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:14:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 15:00 +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> From: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
>
> clang says:
>
> queue.c:204:10: error: no previous prototype for function \
> '__io_uring_flush_sq' [-Werror,-Wmissing-prototypes] \
> unsigned __io_uring_flush_sq(struct io_uring *ring)
> ^
> queue.c:204:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not
> intended \
> to be used outside of this translation unit \
> unsigned __io_uring_flush_sq(struct io_uring *ring)
>
> This function is used by test/iopoll.c, therefore, it can't be
> static.
> Export it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <[email protected]>
> ---
> src/include/liburing.h | 1 +
> src/liburing.map | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
I think changing the tests to use the public API is probably better
than exporting this function. I don't believe it has much general use?
Dylan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 8:00 [PATCH liburing v1 0/7] Ensure we mark internal functions and variables as static Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 8:00 ` [PATCH liburing v1 1/7] liburing.h: Export `__io_uring_flush_sq()` function Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 10:14 ` Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-11-24 11:47 ` Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2022-11-24 8:00 ` [PATCH liburing v1 2/7] test/io_uring_setup: Remove unused functions Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 8:00 ` [PATCH liburing v1 3/7] ucontext-cp: Remove an unused function Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 8:00 ` [PATCH liburing v1 4/7] tests: Mark internal functions as static Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 8:01 ` [PATCH liburing v1 5/7] ucontext-cp: " Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 8:01 ` [PATCH liburing v1 6/7] test/Makefile: Omit `-Wmissing-prototypes` from the C++ compiler flags Ammar Faizi
2022-11-24 8:01 ` [PATCH liburing v1 7/7] github: Add `-Wmissing-prototypes` for GitHub CI bot Ammar Faizi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f750be65c33e5d3a782cebf85954319caa77672f.camel@fb.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox