From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: only wake up sq thread while current task is in io worker context
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:03:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 11/12/20 4:53 AM, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> When IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL is enabled, io_uring will always handle sqes
> in sq thread task context, so in io_iopoll_req_issued(), if we're not
> in io worker context, we don't need to check whether should wake up
> sq thread. io_iopoll_req_issued() calls wq_has_sleeper(), which has
> smp_mb() memory barrier, perf shows obvious overhead:
> Samples: 481K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 299807382878
> Overhead Comma Shared Object Symbol
> 3.69% :9630 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] io_issue_sqe
>
> With this patch, perf shows:
> Samples: 482K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 299929547283
> Overhead Comma Shared Object Symbol
> 0.70% :4015 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] io_issue_sqe
>
> It shows some obvious improvements.
Looks good to me, but:
> @@ -2761,7 +2761,7 @@ static void io_iopoll_req_issued(struct io_kiocb *req)
> else
> list_add_tail(&req->inflight_entry, &ctx->iopoll_list);
>
> - if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) &&
> + if (in_async && (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) &&
> wq_has_sleeper(&ctx->sq_data->wait))
> wake_up(&ctx->sq_data->wait);
> }
This really needs a comment as to why we don't have to check and wake
from this path.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 11:53 [PATCH] io_uring: only wake up sq thread while current task is in io worker context Xiaoguang Wang
2020-11-12 16:03 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox