From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D52E3043D0 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756473731; cv=none; b=XIn6VXRCl3wtTKK0DYLkKccyxJrQJfjyE3tpe20fjhh5aSYWii0DZ2jjBbSydjJjv88McM1xbxoryRl2Mw7m8r1qIWjKYBfEWotq86WafDngXpfx+YwdFr1JaadZfTsuJvbq3w4m+tJUS1yEbG8kaLik77/XGiAqr8N4PNYHig0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756473731; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N+5WFIKkpSCBHcdEkYaqeEr5+8bOiQ8nFMzvcD9Vf3I=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=evyNkx6p3rq+jZYo3njGibycwYtXiUZXeEL2sqgymh2/IAILFsWJnBIO8nzbHCgYfm41v7Ic57xymZXCa2TZeazstzCQbKZli9Lr8em6V9ghJmDYAQ/K+6aIwOFftIZP0axYbwlfKzCMrrdDtSicnS50K9PuJZXP5z0+pwRCD40= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=UuLQ56t9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="UuLQ56t9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1756473728; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=aggFKTWIoz3JmsTS53UGUQwfpKwPCT7EHzMCjR4W6Kc=; b=UuLQ56t9K9ET2MmcIeYyIW1ZImATJoQ1k+kHzh2cIgfahSMGcQJjlkQ3xqVpnEUZ0FSx2b nMhJA3udtBaLTI2Sl89GB/+7soNOGPCYd0PMY1h1kprbkvVlwP2+SUEjHdz65j9Rr9kMQp xRwI+bEvrE7xl8Jqfcsf9SsX5eHNwKg= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-278-KnzjlyZ7MfayR2RiFRF9Hg-1; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:22:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: KnzjlyZ7MfayR2RiFRF9Hg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: KnzjlyZ7MfayR2RiFRF9Hg_1756473725 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3cf12498799so601741f8f.2 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 06:22:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756473725; x=1757078525; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:content-language :from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=aggFKTWIoz3JmsTS53UGUQwfpKwPCT7EHzMCjR4W6Kc=; b=ULkAZ3UJkEzEUeVmNV7HA7okPCPIGqHDBQgPiYFAEwaUS5Z9Qy82PRLcrynb3FU6lm dLfcaaVGKch23Lq2d/h/82A+5T0Xu74rq9I411i6QjVP1U17AHvD7aOgdsKvaYSYNYUv EjtS1YcvBFVstdthyQ035tG+ibrAQUwwtRozEyTAcXPL7OEPmjZCfd0eDoYSmASpEcLY ixfxjxxAuwqdrbTB73CoO/uPM7kk5b2+CwJzkdikT+OMNHDPE7BSzd5f8sjxhenRwTf5 TPRXs6HKOfEoxU8qIPNrPi9r2Ljrg2mh8v/FERUVtRxVeMsvXuZ/OicgoUJjFw2zi4nX pF/w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXa7Yv/QiqhImDoiXVTanYQqZLNpUlALK1AUevLhSs1IfxzGVmUp+bL1GrbXC/Y+h7XIndTFDF5pA==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyRYyorAkrAfClHkcG4hbh/UZ5PlhbMu0HaU2QHso4Lx6+SvBNW s9pXZkAld2urhgNUFnScV57p/dcI5JPoyOi/3vJS30SOI7mI9JfQEa61XHDOo82cfRfTsZWGKkF 6tNuCzJrEayBYBtJaWuPJzXLwLyhaqufeHYL81fSPJiy+GcgCz+WzKwRTjVAtTnGzORF7 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncurSzZ+wTBISRtp34JPRJsf8vfMqEgcpDfwq5HTdgx0JMX6KaVTxWg6qlWvVlX MSmUZEjBNVPOOyMGKCrxYgzXfE6NouxvHJExes/PSB2ctgKrlZlys9ZiYyIdJVLYdfDzmqBUxnj aHCT7/UeaQguEm2zmPSEnj8737m+cYkrRU3o0FxnIg/0bCAojdjwaU81zDk/cRDlVQOTz747TiU IV1K0FM3wpX9h47RhhYuaQ+tYOj1AiSUY20tfEEc/RxLbyQ6vX1246PU1ACpBLqj0vuCU2nf30+ 1VgBaLt6pOLfr76/WM+H/A0SGvcRgs3TwbOuSane0A1BBGh7Hy2fb+y7oCXYxjvBz6kJM3+oP4v yHJ6RUXqjLsPFCFtCpfD2jftb1sg0p2zeVOfiH4huj7qal/cVzs87SRCUOE/HJ8BN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2c0f:b0:3ca:a190:c473 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3caa190c6ecmr9849827f8f.4.1756473725388; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 06:22:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFfrTd/+15/bT4PGZswHLcvGvODyGQLUC+I3pIFqxdvqjEg2cDf44HeYcneQKTQcaMEr0KOA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2c0f:b0:3ca:a190:c473 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3caa190c6ecmr9849784f8f.4.1756473724881; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:d8:2f1d:100:4f8e:bb13:c3c7:f854? (p200300d82f1d01004f8ebb13c3c7f854.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d8:2f1d:100:4f8e:bb13:c3c7:f854]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3cf33add483sm3368560f8f.37.2025.08.29.06.22.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Aug 2025 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:22:01 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 16/36] fs: hugetlbfs: cleanup folio in adjust_range_hwpoison() To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Brendan Jackman , Christoph Lameter , Dennis Zhou , Dmitry Vyukov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Johannes Weiner , John Hubbard , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Liam R. Howlett" , Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Marco Elver , Marek Szyprowski , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Muchun Song , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador , Peter Xu , Robin Murphy , Suren Baghdasaryan , Tejun Heo , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org, Zi Yan References: <20250827220141.262669-1-david@redhat.com> <20250827220141.262669-17-david@redhat.com> <71cf3600-d9cf-4d16-951c-44582b46c0fa@lucifer.local> From: David Hildenbrand Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZoEEwEIAEQCGwMCF4ACGQEFCwkIBwICIgIG FQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3AP+DWgUCaJzangUJJlgIpAAKCRBN 3hD3AP+DWhAxD/9wcL0A+2rtaAmutaKTfxhTP0b4AAp1r/eLxjrbfbCCmh4pqzBhmSX/4z11 opn2KqcOsueRF1t2ENLOWzQu3Roiny2HOU7DajqB4dm1BVMaXQya5ae2ghzlJN9SIoopTWlR 0Af3hPj5E2PYvQhlcqeoehKlBo9rROJv/rjmr2x0yOM8qeTroH/ZzNlCtJ56AsE6Tvl+r7cW 3x7/Jq5WvWeudKrhFh7/yQ7eRvHCjd9bBrZTlgAfiHmX9AnCCPRPpNGNedV9Yty2Jnxhfmbv Pw37LA/jef8zlCDyUh2KCU1xVEOWqg15o1RtTyGV1nXV2O/mfuQJud5vIgzBvHhypc3p6VZJ lEf8YmT+Ol5P7SfCs5/uGdWUYQEMqOlg6w9R4Pe8d+mk8KGvfE9/zTwGg0nRgKqlQXrWRERv cuEwQbridlPAoQHrFWtwpgYMXx2TaZ3sihcIPo9uU5eBs0rf4mOERY75SK+Ekayv2ucTfjxr Kf014py2aoRJHuvy85ee/zIyLmve5hngZTTe3Wg3TInT9UTFzTPhItam6dZ1xqdTGHZYGU0O otRHcwLGt470grdiob6PfVTXoHlBvkWRadMhSuG4RORCDpq89vu5QralFNIf3EysNohoFy2A LYg2/D53xbU/aa4DDzBb5b1Rkg/udO1gZocVQWrDh6I2K3+cCs7BTQRVy5+RARAA59fefSDR 9nMGCb9LbMX+TFAoIQo/wgP5XPyzLYakO+94GrgfZjfhdaxPXMsl2+o8jhp/hlIzG56taNdt VZtPp3ih1AgbR8rHgXw1xwOpuAd5lE1qNd54ndHuADO9a9A0vPimIes78Hi1/yy+ZEEvRkHk /kDa6F3AtTc1m4rbbOk2fiKzzsE9YXweFjQvl9p+AMw6qd/iC4lUk9g0+FQXNdRs+o4o6Qvy iOQJfGQ4UcBuOy1IrkJrd8qq5jet1fcM2j4QvsW8CLDWZS1L7kZ5gT5EycMKxUWb8LuRjxzZ 3QY1aQH2kkzn6acigU3HLtgFyV1gBNV44ehjgvJpRY2cC8VhanTx0dZ9mj1YKIky5N+C0f21 zvntBqcxV0+3p8MrxRRcgEtDZNav+xAoT3G0W4SahAaUTWXpsZoOecwtxi74CyneQNPTDjNg azHmvpdBVEfj7k3p4dmJp5i0U66Onmf6mMFpArvBRSMOKU9DlAzMi4IvhiNWjKVaIE2Se9BY FdKVAJaZq85P2y20ZBd08ILnKcj7XKZkLU5FkoA0udEBvQ0f9QLNyyy3DZMCQWcwRuj1m73D sq8DEFBdZ5eEkj1dCyx+t/ga6x2rHyc8Sl86oK1tvAkwBNsfKou3v+jP/l14a7DGBvrmlYjO 59o3t6inu6H7pt7OL6u6BQj7DoMAEQEAAcLBfAQYAQgAJgIbDBYhBBvZyq1zXEw6Rg38yk3e EPcA/4NaBQJonNqrBQkmWAihAAoJEE3eEPcA/4NaKtMQALAJ8PzprBEXbXcEXwDKQu+P/vts IfUb1UNMfMV76BicGa5NCZnJNQASDP/+bFg6O3gx5NbhHHPeaWz/VxlOmYHokHodOvtL0WCC 8A5PEP8tOk6029Z+J+xUcMrJClNVFpzVvOpb1lCbhjwAV465Hy+NUSbbUiRxdzNQtLtgZzOV Zw7jxUCs4UUZLQTCuBpFgb15bBxYZ/BL9MbzxPxvfUQIPbnzQMcqtpUs21CMK2PdfCh5c4gS sDci6D5/ZIBw94UQWmGpM/O1ilGXde2ZzzGYl64glmccD8e87OnEgKnH3FbnJnT4iJchtSvx yJNi1+t0+qDti4m88+/9IuPqCKb6Stl+s2dnLtJNrjXBGJtsQG/sRpqsJz5x1/2nPJSRMsx9 5YfqbdrJSOFXDzZ8/r82HgQEtUvlSXNaXCa95ez0UkOG7+bDm2b3s0XahBQeLVCH0mw3RAQg r7xDAYKIrAwfHHmMTnBQDPJwVqxJjVNr7yBic4yfzVWGCGNE4DnOW0vcIeoyhy9vnIa3w1uZ 3iyY2Nsd7JxfKu1PRhCGwXzRw5TlfEsoRI7V9A8isUCoqE2Dzh3FvYHVeX4Us+bRL/oqareJ CIFqgYMyvHj7Q06kTKmauOe4Nf0l0qEkIuIzfoLJ3qr5UyXc2hLtWyT9Ir+lYlX9efqh7mOY qIws/H2t In-Reply-To: <71cf3600-d9cf-4d16-951c-44582b46c0fa@lucifer.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Lord above. > > Also semantics of 'if bytes == 0, then check first page anyway' which you do > capture. Yeah, I think bytes == 0 would not make any sense, though. Staring briefly at the single caller, that seems to be the case (bytes != 0). > > OK think I have convinced myself this is right, so hopefully no deeply subtle > off-by-one issues here :P > > Anyway, LGTM, so: > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes > >> --- >> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 33 +++++++++++---------------------- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >> index c5a46d10afaa0..6ca1f6b45c1e5 100644 >> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >> @@ -198,31 +198,20 @@ hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, >> static size_t adjust_range_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, >> size_t bytes) >> { >> - struct page *page; >> - size_t n = 0; >> - size_t res = 0; >> - >> - /* First page to start the loop. */ >> - page = folio_page(folio, offset / PAGE_SIZE); >> - offset %= PAGE_SIZE; >> - while (1) { >> - if (is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage(page)) >> - break; >> + struct page *page = folio_page(folio, offset / PAGE_SIZE); >> + size_t safe_bytes; >> + >> + if (is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage(page)) >> + return 0; >> + /* Safe to read the remaining bytes in this page. */ >> + safe_bytes = PAGE_SIZE - (offset % PAGE_SIZE); >> + page++; >> >> - /* Safe to read n bytes without touching HWPOISON subpage. */ >> - n = min(bytes, (size_t)PAGE_SIZE - offset); >> - res += n; >> - bytes -= n; >> - if (!bytes || !n) >> + for (; safe_bytes < bytes; safe_bytes += PAGE_SIZE, page++) > > OK this is quite subtle - so if safe_bytes == bytes, this means we've confirmed > that all requested bytes are safe. > > So offset=0, bytes = 4096 would fail this (as safe_bytes == 4096). > > Maybe worth putting something like: > > /* > * Now we check page-by-page in the folio to see if any bytes we don't > * yet know to be safe are contained within posioned pages or not. > */ > > Above the loop. Or something like this. "Check each remaining page as long as we are not done yet." > >> + if (is_raw_hwpoison_page_in_hugepage(page)) >> break; >> - offset += n; >> - if (offset == PAGE_SIZE) { >> - page++; >> - offset = 0; >> - } >> - } >> >> - return res; >> + return min(safe_bytes, bytes); > > Yeah given above analysis this seems correct. > > You must have torn your hair out over this :) I could resist the urge to clean that up, yes. I'll also drop the "The implementation borrows the iteration logic from copy_page_to_iter*." part, because I suspect this comment no longer makes sense. Thanks! -- Cheers David / dhildenb