* [Question] about async buffered reads feature
@ 2020-09-25 9:18 Hao_Xu
2020-09-25 21:23 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hao_Xu @ 2020-09-25 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: io-uring
Hi Jens,
I'm doing tests about this feature: [PATCHSET RFC 0/11] Add support for
async buffered reads
But currently with fio testing, I found the code doesn't go to the
essential places in the function generic_file_buffered_read:
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ) {
if (written) {
put_page(page);
goto out;
}
error = wait_on_page_locked_async(page,
iocb->ki_waitq);
} else {
and
page_not_up_to_date:
/* Get exclusive access to the page ... */
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)
error = lock_page_async(page, iocb->ki_waitq);
else
could you give me a copy of your test program which you mentioned in the
RFC?
My testing environment:
fio version: 3.10
kernel version: the mainline kernel, latest commit is
805c6d3c19210c90c109107d189744e960eae025
Thanks,
Hao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Question] about async buffered reads feature
2020-09-25 9:18 [Question] about async buffered reads feature Hao_Xu
@ 2020-09-25 21:23 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-25 21:39 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-09-25 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hao_Xu; +Cc: io-uring
On 9/25/20 3:18 AM, Hao_Xu wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> I'm doing tests about this feature: [PATCHSET RFC 0/11] Add support for
> async buffered reads
> But currently with fio testing, I found the code doesn't go to the
> essential places in the function generic_file_buffered_read:
>
> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ) {
> if (written) {
> put_page(page);
> goto out;
> }
> error = wait_on_page_locked_async(page,
> iocb->ki_waitq);
> } else {
>
> and
>
> page_not_up_to_date:
> /* Get exclusive access to the page ... */
> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)
> error = lock_page_async(page, iocb->ki_waitq);
> else
Can you try with this added? Looks like a regression got introduced...
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 40670ad4446c..99b842ac2dc0 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -3339,10 +3339,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
goto done;
/* some cases will consume bytes even on error returns */
iov_iter_revert(iter, iov_count - iov_iter_count(iter));
- ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, false);
- if (ret)
- goto out_free;
- return -EAGAIN;
+ goto copy_iov;
} else if (ret < 0) {
/* make sure -ERESTARTSYS -> -EINTR is done */
goto done;
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Question] about async buffered reads feature
2020-09-25 21:23 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2020-09-25 21:39 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-09-25 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hao_Xu; +Cc: io-uring
On 9/25/20 3:23 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/25/20 3:18 AM, Hao_Xu wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>> I'm doing tests about this feature: [PATCHSET RFC 0/11] Add support for
>> async buffered reads
>> But currently with fio testing, I found the code doesn't go to the
>> essential places in the function generic_file_buffered_read:
>>
>> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ) {
>> if (written) {
>> put_page(page);
>> goto out;
>> }
>> error = wait_on_page_locked_async(page,
>> iocb->ki_waitq);
>> } else {
>>
>> and
>>
>> page_not_up_to_date:
>> /* Get exclusive access to the page ... */
>> if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)
>> error = lock_page_async(page, iocb->ki_waitq);
>> else
>
> Can you try with this added? Looks like a regression got introduced...
Oops, needs 'ret' cleared too. This should be better!
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index ad828fa19af4..11b8e428300d 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -3172,10 +3172,8 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
goto done;
/* some cases will consume bytes even on error returns */
iov_iter_revert(iter, iov_count - iov_iter_count(iter));
- ret = io_setup_async_rw(req, iovec, inline_vecs, iter, false);
- if (ret)
- goto out_free;
- return -EAGAIN;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto copy_iov;
} else if (ret < 0) {
/* make sure -ERESTARTSYS -> -EINTR is done */
goto done;
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-25 21:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-25 9:18 [Question] about async buffered reads feature Hao_Xu
2020-09-25 21:23 ` Jens Axboe
2020-09-25 21:39 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox