From: Bijan Mottahedeh <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] io_uring: support buffer registration sharing
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:01:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 1/12/2021 1:33 PM, Bijan Mottahedeh wrote:
> Implement buffer sharing among multiple rings.
>
> A ring shares its (future) buffer registrations at setup time with
> IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF. A ring attaches to another ring's buffer
> registration at setup time with IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF, after
> authenticating with the buffer registration owner's fd. Any updates to
> the owner's buffer registrations become immediately available to the
> attached rings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bijan Mottahedeh <[email protected]>
>
> Conflicts:
> fs/io_uring.c
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 37639b9..856a570b 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -8439,6 +8439,13 @@ static void io_buffers_map_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> ctx->nr_user_bufs = 0;
> }
>
> +static void io_detach_buf_data(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + percpu_ref_put(&ctx->buf_data->refs);
> + ctx->buf_data = NULL;
> + ctx->nr_user_bufs = 0;
> +}
> +
> static int io_sqe_buffers_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> {
> struct fixed_rsrc_data *data = ctx->buf_data;
> @@ -8447,6 +8454,11 @@ static int io_sqe_buffers_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> if (!data)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> + if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF) {
> + io_detach_buf_data(ctx);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> ret = io_rsrc_ref_quiesce(data, ctx, alloc_fixed_buf_ref_node);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -8690,9 +8702,13 @@ static struct fixed_rsrc_data *io_buffers_map_alloc(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> if (!nr_args || nr_args > IORING_MAX_FIXED_BUFS)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - buf_data = alloc_fixed_rsrc_data(ctx);
> - if (IS_ERR(buf_data))
> - return buf_data;
> + if (ctx->buf_data) {
> + buf_data = ctx->buf_data;
> + } else {
> + buf_data = alloc_fixed_rsrc_data(ctx);
> + if (IS_ERR(buf_data))
> + return buf_data;
> + }
>
> nr_tables = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_args, IORING_MAX_BUFS_TABLE);
> buf_data->table = kcalloc(nr_tables, sizeof(*buf_data->table),
> @@ -8757,9 +8773,17 @@ static int io_sqe_buffers_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
> if (ctx->nr_user_bufs)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> + if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF) {
> + if (!ctx->buf_data)
> + return -EFAULT;
> + ctx->nr_user_bufs = ctx->buf_data->ctx->nr_user_bufs;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> buf_data = io_buffers_map_alloc(ctx, nr_args);
> if (IS_ERR(buf_data))
> return PTR_ERR(buf_data);
> + ctx->buf_data = buf_data;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++, ctx->nr_user_bufs++) {
> struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
> @@ -8783,7 +8807,6 @@ static int io_sqe_buffers_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
> break;
> }
>
> - ctx->buf_data = buf_data;
> if (ret) {
> io_sqe_buffers_unregister(ctx);
> return ret;
> @@ -9831,6 +9854,55 @@ static struct file *io_uring_get_file(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
> return file;
> }
>
> +static int io_attach_buf_data(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> + struct io_uring_params *p)
> +{
> + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx_attach;
> + struct fd f;
> +
> + f = fdget(p->wq_fd);
> + if (!f.file)
> + return -EBADF;
> + if (f.file->f_op != &io_uring_fops) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ctx_attach = f.file->private_data;
> + if (!ctx_attach->buf_data) {
> + fdput(f);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + ctx->buf_data = ctx_attach->buf_data;
> +
> + percpu_ref_get(&ctx->buf_data->refs);
> + fdput(f);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int io_init_buf_data(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_uring_params *p)
> +{
> + if ((p->flags & (IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF)) ==
> + (IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (p->flags & IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF) {
> + struct fixed_rsrc_data *buf_data;
> +
> + buf_data = alloc_fixed_rsrc_data(ctx);
> + if (IS_ERR(buf_data))
> + return PTR_ERR(buf_data);
> +
> + ctx->buf_data = buf_data;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (p->flags & IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF)
> + return io_attach_buf_data(ctx, p);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int io_uring_create(unsigned entries, struct io_uring_params *p,
> struct io_uring_params __user *params)
> {
> @@ -9948,6 +10020,10 @@ static int io_uring_create(unsigned entries, struct io_uring_params *p,
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
> + ret = io_init_buf_data(ctx, p);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> ret = io_sq_offload_create(ctx, p);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> @@ -10028,6 +10104,7 @@ static long io_uring_setup(u32 entries, struct io_uring_params __user *params)
> if (p.flags & ~(IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL | IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL |
> IORING_SETUP_SQ_AFF | IORING_SETUP_CQSIZE |
> IORING_SETUP_CLAMP | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ |
> + IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF | IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF |
> IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index b289ef8..3ad786a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ enum {
> #define IORING_SETUP_CLAMP (1U << 4) /* clamp SQ/CQ ring sizes */
> #define IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ (1U << 5) /* attach to existing wq */
> #define IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED (1U << 6) /* start with ring disabled */
> +#define IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF (1U << 7) /* share buffer registration */
> +#define IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF (1U << 8) /* attach buffer registration */
>
> enum {
> IORING_OP_NOP,
>
I recreated the deadlock scenario you had raised:
> Ok, now the original io_uring instance will wait until the attached
> once get rid of their references. That's a versatile ground to have
> in kernel deadlocks.
>
> task1: uring1 = create()
> task2: uring2 = create()
> task1: uring3 = create(share=uring2);
> task2: uring4 = create(share=uring1);
>
> task1: io_sqe_buffers_unregister(uring1)
> task2: io_sqe_buffers_unregister(uring2)
>
> If I skimmed through the code right, that should hang unkillably.
with the following test:
+static int test_deadlock(void)
+{
+ int i, pid, ret;
+ struct io_uring rings[4];
+ struct io_uring_params p = {};
+
+ p.flags = IORING_SETUP_SHARE_BUF;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ ret = io_uring_queue_init_params(1, &rings[i], &p);
+ if (ret) {
+ verror("queue_init share");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ p.flags = IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_BUF;
+
+ pid = fork();
+ if (pid) {
+ p.wq_fd = rings[1].ring_fd;
+ ret = io_uring_queue_init_params(1, &rings[3], &p);
+ } else {
+ p.wq_fd = rings[0].ring_fd;
+ ret = io_uring_queue_init_params(1, &rings[4], &p);
+ }
+
+ if (ret) {
+ verror("queue_init attach");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+
+ vinfo(V1, "unregister\n");
+
+ if (pid) {
+ close(rings[1].ring_fd);
+ ret = io_uring_unregister_buffers(&rings[0]);
+ } else {
+ close(rings[0].ring_fd);
+ ret = io_uring_unregister_buffers(&rings[1]);
+ }
+
+ vinfo(V1, "unregister done\n");
+
+ if (ret)
+ verror("unregister");
+
+ return ret;
+}
The two processe in the test hang but can be interrupted.
I checked that
ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&data->done);
in io_rsrc_ref_quiesce() returns -ERESTARTSYS (-512) after hitting ^C
and that
ret = io_run_task_work_sig();
returns -EINTR (-4)
Finally in
io_ring_ctx_free()
-> io_sqe_buffers_unregister()
-> io_rsrc_ref_quiesce()
ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&data->done);
returns 0.
So it looks like the unkillable hang is not there.
However, when I take out the io_uring_unregister_buffers() calls from
the test, one of the processes gets a segfault with the following trace
and I'm not sure what the cause is.
buffer-share[2791]: segfault at 7f2ca196b040 ip ]
Code: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
#0 io_uring_release (inode=0xffff88810665a5a8, file=0xffff88811b5eb540)
at fs/io_uring.c:9116
#1 0xffffffff812eb208 in __fput (file=0xffff88811b5eb540)
at fs/file_table.c:280
#2 0xffffffff810aa857 in task_work_run () at kernel/task_work.c:140
#3 0xffffffff8108b37d in exit_task_work (task=0xffff8881321b8040)
at ./include/linux/task_work.h:30
#4 do_exit (code=code@entry=139) at kernel/exit.c:825
#5 0xffffffff8108bbe7 in do_group_exit (exit_code=139) at kernel/exit.c:922
#6 0xffffffff81099697 in get_signal (ksig=ksig@entry=0xffffc900023d3ea8)
at kernel/signal.c:2770
#7 0xffffffff81031819 in arch_do_signal_or_restart
(regs=0xffffc900023d3f58,
has_signal=<optimized out>) at ./arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:15
#8 0xffffffff8111dd72 in handle_signal_work (ti_work=<optimized out>,
regs=0xffffc900023d3f58) at kernel/entry/common.c:147
#9 exit_to_user_mode_loop (ti_work=<optimized out>, regs=<optimized out>)
at kernel/entry/common.c:171
#10 exit_to_user_mode_prepare (regs=0xffffc900023d3f58)
at kernel/entry/common.c:201
#11 0xffffffff819c5645 in irqentry_exit_to_user_mode (regs=<optimized out>)
at kernel/entry/common.c:315
#12 0xffffffff81a00ade in asm_exc_page_fault ()
at ./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:580
#13 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 21:33 [PATCH v5 00/13] io_uring: buffer registration enhancements Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] io_uring: rename file related variables to rsrc Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] io_uring: generalize io_queue_rsrc_removal Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] io_uring: separate ref_list from fixed_rsrc_data Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] io_uring: split alloc_fixed_file_ref_node Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] io_uring: add rsrc_ref locking routines Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] io_uring: implement fixed buffers registration similar to fixed files Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-15 17:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] io_uring: create common fixed_rsrc_ref_node handling routines Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] io_uring: generalize files_update functionlity to rsrc_update Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-16 18:20 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] io_uring: support buffer registration updates Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] io_uring: create common fixed_rsrc_data allocation routines Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-16 18:26 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] io_uring: make percpu_ref_release names consistent Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] io_uring: call io_get_fixed_rsrc_ref for buffers Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-15 17:44 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] io_uring: support buffer registration sharing Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-14 2:01 ` Bijan Mottahedeh [this message]
2021-01-14 21:17 ` Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-16 18:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-14 21:20 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] io_uring: buffer registration enhancements Pavel Begunkov
2021-01-14 22:44 ` Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-14 22:54 ` Bijan Mottahedeh
2021-01-15 4:42 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox