public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>,
	Xan Charbonnet <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Bernhard Schmidt <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:20:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 1/23/25 20:49, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Xan,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 02:31:34PM -0600, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
>> I rented a Linode and have been trying to load it down with sysbench
>> activity while doing a mariabackup and a mysqldump, also while spinning up
>> the CPU with zstd benchmarks.  So far I've had no luck triggering the fault.
>>
>> I've also been doing some kernel compilation.  I followed this guide:
>> https://www.dwarmstrong.org/kernel/
>> (except that I used make -j24 to build in parallel and used make
>> localmodconfig to compile only the modules I need)
>>
>> I've built the following kernels:
>> 6.1.123 (equivalent to linux-image-6.1.0-29-amd64)
>> 6.1.122
>> 6.1.121
>> 6.1.120
>>
>> So far they have all exhibited the behavior.  Next up is 6.1.119 which is
>> equivalent to linux-image-6.1.0-28-amd64.  My expectation is that the fault
>> will not appear for this kernel.
>>
>> It looks like the issue is here somewhere:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.1.120
>>
>> I have to work on some other things, and it'll take a while to prove the
>> negative (that is, to know that the failure isn't happening).  I'll post
>> back with the 6.1.119 results when I have them.
> 
> Additionally please try with 6.1.120 and revert this commit
> 
> 3ab9326f93ec ("io_uring: wake up optimisations")
> 
> (which landed in 6.1.120).
> 
> If that solves the problem maybe we miss some prequisites in the 6.1.y
> series here?

I'm not sure why the commit was backported (need to look it up),
but from a quick look it does seem to miss a barrier present in
the original patch.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <173706089225.4380.9492796104667651797.reportbug@backup22.biblionix.com>
     [not found] ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]   ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]     ` <[email protected]>
2025-01-23 20:05       ` Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-23 20:26         ` Jens Axboe
     [not found] ` <[email protected]>
2025-01-23 20:49   ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-23 23:20     ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-01-24  2:10       ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-24  5:24       ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-24 10:33         ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-24 16:30           ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-24 18:40             ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-24 20:33               ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-24 20:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-26 22:48                   ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-27 16:38                     ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-27 17:21                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-27 16:49                     ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox