public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH][next] io_uring: fix flags check for the REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED setting
@ 2020-10-15 11:55 Colin King
  2020-10-15 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2020-10-15 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Viro, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, linux-fsdevel,
	io-uring
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>

Currently the check for REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED is always true because
the | operator is being used. I believe this check should be checking
if the bit is set using the & operator.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Wrong operator used")
Fixes: 9c357fed168a ("io_uring: fix REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED by killing it")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 01d0b35415dc..5ef54df03d7c 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static void __io_fail_links(struct io_kiocb *req)
 		 * but avoid REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED because it may deadlock on
 		 * work.fs->lock.
 		 */
-		if (link->flags | REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED)
+		if (link->flags & REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED)
 			io_put_req_deferred(link, 2);
 		else
 			io_double_put_req(link);
-- 
2.27.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH][next] io_uring: fix flags check for the REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED setting
  2020-10-15 11:55 [PATCH][next] io_uring: fix flags check for the REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED setting Colin King
@ 2020-10-15 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-10-15 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin King, Alexander Viro, Pavel Begunkov, linux-fsdevel,
	io-uring
  Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel

On 10/15/20 5:55 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> 
> Currently the check for REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED is always true because
> the | operator is being used. I believe this check should be checking
> if the bit is set using the & operator.

It should - I folded in the incremental from Pavel. This just meant that
we took the slow and safe path, but it obviously should be an AND here.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-15 13:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-15 11:55 [PATCH][next] io_uring: fix flags check for the REQ_F_WORK_INITIALIZED setting Colin King
2020-10-15 13:12 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox