From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40721CCA47A for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237280AbiFTA0k (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:26:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237272AbiFTA0i (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jun 2022 20:26:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA21A1B0 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 17:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id q9so12469261wrd.8 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 17:26:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z2uPrsk7BEZP8sHdJzPwYohfCoy3RRkhF5HGc7u3Tgc=; b=NO5q4vnfRZgc0MZh8SNifkQ/fs3EPGkZr4JN0LeBuFhvliZ8/z8a3HXmdpcIrsgaz8 i8DW2UgplxaCcqp1UQAIxM9Ygg/ZUNGNx1p1FL0L+nnwfQYvqiJ8wWM6bB0MwZRbFFz1 Wdekh7ji2i/11zYkCsekwuFKFLXZ9Gmwwpbrq1Fuufg4O1lmGAKCWDbRC2mLMbnc8iZ2 HYMxC8m9Ru2zDRu1tQjIbapca+bZJBeaPhl/T4kbz5QxkD2pKKxrX1KzTeb2YmK7VQH0 EM1+KO7H0T0PfSNvsIJBvBGFw/byCpRPP4yyGND0gzw/Nn/OBozqrIsscAZCXtluh5zi NhoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z2uPrsk7BEZP8sHdJzPwYohfCoy3RRkhF5HGc7u3Tgc=; b=Em9pZaQzJcOVpBYR3KtN8V4T43MlcEk6icAJvXedxA3+ofQrmokSZsbCHZbsunLOkO sE9Kfo3x92GnoicKhXbnsqum7GO2NInNJqe0uvfBTcD+it9pLbrbGJdx7D1gBVH9VplG 59vTQv9LqEskfY+e565meLWnBIc1pj6Ol7v5V8j94VvJ7+7AjAMZgkmbKk0r/xTaZ6ze wqcnb6AMMqcY9mA+59a9GyWLd1nHTIVj9IVU4zERg6vKGzV3OmyUwDEwAKeTHvCnWcu/ BgSLFk9xgF96eQOe0NPL1uTEgcJ+lyloX9TdjxVCjTYfirh9w7mxd+pZcX0qiVU6V0kQ qlYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+OkCpVs5I7JlNlSQw5UYXDPk52tF7HVx8jKVzBqk+Rmy7iLK9X B064RUi+eLQIqlpdvnRhgBFCJ4qC8LJstg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u2lUOYo6uIC27D3KtiVtmc4ls3+KViZwrDvu2w5EjfnwmzEs2QThs69GcM5L1QcUXlckl/nw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:168c:b0:218:4523:c975 with SMTP id y12-20020a056000168c00b002184523c975mr19922370wrd.23.1655684795691; Sun, 19 Jun 2022 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1localhost (188.28.125.106.threembb.co.uk. [188.28.125.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18-20020a5d4312000000b002167efdd549sm11543807wrq.38.2022.06.19.17.26.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 19 Jun 2022 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Begunkov To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jens Axboe , asml.silence@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH for-next 05/10] io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 01:25:56 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); /* post CQEs */ io_commit_cqring(ctx); spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); We have many places repeating this sequence, and the three function unlock section is not perfect from the maintainance perspective and also makes harder to add new locking/sync trick. Introduce to helpers. io_cq_lock(), which is simple and only grabs ->completion_lock, and io_cq_unlock_post() encapsulating the three call section. Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov --- io_uring/io_uring.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ io_uring/io_uring.h | 9 ++++++- io_uring/timeout.c | 6 ++--- 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index ded42d884c49..82a9e4e2a3e2 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ void __io_commit_cqring_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) io_eventfd_signal(ctx); } -void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +static inline void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) { if (unlikely(ctx->off_timeout_used || ctx->drain_active || ctx->has_evfd)) @@ -536,6 +536,19 @@ void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) io_cqring_wake(ctx); } +static inline void __io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) + __releases(ctx->completion_lock) +{ + io_commit_cqring(ctx); + spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); +} + +void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) +{ + __io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); +} + /* Returns true if there are no backlogged entries after the flush */ static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force) { @@ -548,7 +561,7 @@ static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force) if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32) cqe_size <<= 1; - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cq_lock(ctx); while (!list_empty(&ctx->cq_overflow_list)) { struct io_uring_cqe *cqe = io_get_cqe(ctx); struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe; @@ -572,9 +585,7 @@ static bool __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force) atomic_andnot(IORING_SQ_CQ_OVERFLOW, &ctx->rings->sq_flags); } - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); return all_flushed; } @@ -760,11 +771,9 @@ bool io_post_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, { bool filled; - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cq_lock(ctx); filled = io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, user_data, res, cflags); - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); return filled; } @@ -810,11 +819,9 @@ void io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req) { struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cq_lock(ctx); __io_req_complete_post(req); - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); } inline void __io_req_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags) @@ -946,11 +953,9 @@ static void __io_req_find_next_prep(struct io_kiocb *req) { struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cq_lock(ctx); io_disarm_next(req); - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); } static inline struct io_kiocb *io_req_find_next(struct io_kiocb *req) @@ -984,13 +989,6 @@ static void ctx_flush_and_put(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool *locked) percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs); } -static inline void ctx_commit_and_unlock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) -{ - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); -} - static void handle_prev_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, struct io_ring_ctx **ctx, bool *uring_locked) { @@ -1006,7 +1004,7 @@ static void handle_prev_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, if (req->ctx != *ctx) { if (unlikely(!*uring_locked && *ctx)) - ctx_commit_and_unlock(*ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(*ctx); ctx_flush_and_put(*ctx, uring_locked); *ctx = req->ctx; @@ -1014,7 +1012,7 @@ static void handle_prev_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, *uring_locked = mutex_trylock(&(*ctx)->uring_lock); percpu_ref_get(&(*ctx)->refs); if (unlikely(!*uring_locked)) - spin_lock(&(*ctx)->completion_lock); + io_cq_lock(*ctx); } if (likely(*uring_locked)) { req->io_task_work.func(req, uring_locked); @@ -1026,7 +1024,7 @@ static void handle_prev_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, } while (node); if (unlikely(!*uring_locked)) - ctx_commit_and_unlock(*ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(*ctx); } static void handle_tw_list(struct io_wq_work_node *node, @@ -1261,10 +1259,7 @@ static void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_CQE_SKIP)) __io_fill_cqe_req(ctx, req); } - - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + __io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); io_free_batch_list(ctx, state->compl_reqs.first); INIT_WQ_LIST(&state->compl_reqs); diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h index bdc62727638b..738fb96575ab 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.h +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ void __io_req_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags); void io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req); void __io_req_complete_post(struct io_kiocb *req); bool io_post_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags); -void io_cqring_ev_posted(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx); void __io_commit_cqring_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx); struct page **io_pin_pages(unsigned long ubuf, unsigned long len, int *npages); @@ -66,6 +65,14 @@ bool io_match_task_safe(struct io_kiocb *head, struct task_struct *task, #define io_for_each_link(pos, head) \ for (pos = (head); pos; pos = pos->link) +static inline void io_cq_lock(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) + __acquires(ctx->completion_lock) +{ + spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); +} + +void io_cq_unlock_post(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx); + static inline struct io_uring_cqe *io_get_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) { if (likely(ctx->cqe_cached < ctx->cqe_sentinel)) { diff --git a/io_uring/timeout.c b/io_uring/timeout.c index 424b2fc858b8..7e2c341f9762 100644 --- a/io_uring/timeout.c +++ b/io_uring/timeout.c @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ __cold bool io_kill_timeouts(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *tsk, struct io_timeout *timeout, *tmp; int canceled = 0; - spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock); + io_cq_lock(ctx); spin_lock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(timeout, tmp, &ctx->timeout_list, list) { struct io_kiocb *req = cmd_to_io_kiocb(timeout); @@ -627,8 +627,6 @@ __cold bool io_kill_timeouts(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *tsk, canceled++; } spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->timeout_lock); - io_commit_cqring(ctx); - spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); - io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + io_cq_unlock_post(ctx); return canceled != 0; } -- 2.36.1