From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Julian Orth <ju.orth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] af_unix: don't post cmsg for SO_INQ unless explicitly asked for
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:55:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe9dbb70-c345-41b2-96d6-2788e2510886@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.18e89ba05fbac@gmail.com>
On 12/19/25 12:02 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>> A previous commit added SO_INQ support for AF_UNIX (SOCK_STREAM), but it
>> posts a SCM_INQ cmsg even if just msg->msg_get_inq is set. This is
>> incorrect, as ->msg_get_inq is just the caller asking for the remainder
>> to be passed back in msg->msg_inq, it has nothing to do with cmsg. The
>> original commit states that this is done to make sockets
>> io_uring-friendly", but it's actually incorrect as io_uring doesn't use
>> cmsg headers internally at all, and it's actively wrong as this means
>> that cmsg's are always posted if someone does recvmsg via io_uring.
>>
>> Fix that up by only posting a cmsg if u->recvmsg_inq is set.
>>
>> Additionally, mirror how TCP handles inquiry handling in that it should
>> only be done for a successful return. This makes the logic for the two
>> identical.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Fixes: df30285b3670 ("af_unix: Introduce SO_INQ.")
>> Reported-by: Julian Orth <ju.orth@gmail.com>
>> Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/1509
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> V2:
>> - Unify logic with tcp
>> - Squash the two patches into one
>>
>> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> index 55cdebfa0da0..a7ca74653d94 100644
>> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>> @@ -2904,6 +2904,7 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
>> unsigned int last_len;
>> struct unix_sock *u;
>> int copied = 0;
>> + bool do_cmsg;
>> int err = 0;
>> long timeo;
>> int target;
>> @@ -2929,6 +2930,9 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
>>
>> u = unix_sk(sk);
>>
>> + do_cmsg = READ_ONCE(u->recvmsg_inq);
>> + if (do_cmsg)
>> + msg->msg_get_inq = 1;
>
> I would avoid overwriting user written fields if it's easy to do so.
>
> In this case it probably is harmless. But we've learned the hard way
> that applications can even get confused by recvmsg setting msg_flags.
> I've seen multiple reports of applications failing to scrub that field
> inbetween calls.
>
> Also just more similar to tcp:
>
> do_cmsg = READ_ONCE(u->recvmsg_inq);
> if ((do_cmsg || msg->msg_get_inq) && (copied ?: err) >= 0) {
I think you need to look closer, because this is actually what the tcp
path does:
if (tp->recvmsg_inq) {
[...]
msg->msg_get_inq = 1;
}
to avoid needing to check two things at the bottom. Which is actually
why I did this for streams too, as the whole point was to unify the two
and make them look the same.
Like I said, I'm happy to give you guys what you want, but you can't
both ask for consistency and then want it different too. I just want the
bug fixed and out of my hair and into a stable release, as it's causing
regressions.
Let me know, and I'll send out a v3 if needed. But then let's please
have that be it and move on.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 22:21 [PATCH v2] af_unix: don't post cmsg for SO_INQ unless explicitly asked for Jens Axboe
2025-12-19 19:02 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-12-19 19:55 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-12-19 20:08 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-12-19 20:24 ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-19 22:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-12-23 17:27 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe9dbb70-c345-41b2-96d6-2788e2510886@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ju.orth@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox