From: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>,
Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>,
Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>,
Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>,
Alexander Mihalicyn <[email protected]>,
Andrei Vagin <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for io_uring BPF iterators
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:21:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 11/18/21 10:33 AM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:24:19PM IST, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/15/21 9:42 PM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
>>> This exercises the io_uring_buf and io_uring_file iterators, and tests
>>> sparse file sets as well.
>>>
>>> Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_io_uring.c | 50 ++++
>>> 2 files changed, 276 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_io_uring.c
>>>
[...]
>>> +
>>> + ret = snprintf(str, sizeof(buf) - len, "E:%zu\n", ARRAY_SIZE(iovs));
>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(ret, 0, "snprintf") || !ASSERT_LT(ret, sizeof(buf) - len, "snprintf"))
>>> + goto end_close_fd;
>>> +
>>> + iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(skel->links.dump_io_uring_buf));
>>> + if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "bpf_iter_create"))
>>> + goto end_close_fd;
>>> +
>>> + ret = read_fd_into_buffer(iter_fd, rbuf, sizeof(rbuf));
>>> + if (!ASSERT_GT(ret, 0, "read_fd_into_buffer"))
>>> + goto end_close_iter;
>>> +
>>> + ASSERT_OK(strcmp(rbuf, buf), "compare iterator output");
>>> +
>>> + puts("=== Expected Output ===");
>>> + printf("%s", buf);
>>> + puts("==== Actual Output ====");
>>> + printf("%s", rbuf);
>>> + puts("=======================");
>>
>> Maybe you can do an actual comparison and use ASSERT_* macros to check
>> result?
>>
>
> I already did that in the line above first "puts". The printing is just for
> better debugging, to show the incorrect output in case test fails. Also in epoll
> test in the next patch the order of entries is not fixed, since they are sorted
> using struct file pointer.
I see, maybe the following which prints out details only if failure?
if (!ASSERT_OK(strcmp(rbuf, buf), "compare iterator output")) {
puts("=== ...");
...
}
>
>>> +
>>> +end_close_iter:
>>> + close(iter_fd);
>>> +end_close_fd:
>>> + close(fd);
>>> +end:
>>> + while (i--)
>>> + munmap(iovs[i].iov_base, iovs[i].iov_len);
>>> + bpf_iter_io_uring__destroy(skel);
>>> +}
>>> +
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-18 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 5:42 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] Introduce BPF iterators for io_uring and epoll Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] io_uring: Implement eBPF iterator for registered buffers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 17:21 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-18 18:28 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 19:13 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-18 22:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-19 4:15 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-19 4:44 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-19 4:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-19 5:16 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-19 5:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-19 6:12 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-12-03 15:52 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-12-03 23:16 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf: Add bpf_page_to_pfn helper Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-17 12:35 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-17 13:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-18 17:27 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-18 18:30 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 19:18 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-18 19:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] io_uring: Implement eBPF iterator for registered files Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 17:33 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] epoll: Implement eBPF iterator for registered items Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 17:50 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for io_uring BPF iterators Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 17:54 ` Yonghong Song
2021-11-18 18:33 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-18 19:21 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add test for epoll BPF iterator Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Test partial reads for io_uring, epoll iterators Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-11-16 5:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix btf_dump test for bpf_iter_link_info Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox