From: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
kernel list <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: bcachefs: suspicious mm pointer in struct dio_write
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:58:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hrx6kaqeyqdchmv24xivrooyimackqx5mxm6vlvj3y5gusxgno@gjsbtm76unrs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:51:26PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 2:27?PM Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:16:24PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > I'd argue the fact that you are using an mm from a different process
> > > without grabbing a reference is the wrinkle. I just don't think it's a
> > > problem right now, but it could be... aio is tied to the mm because of
> > > how it does completions, potentially, and hence needs this exit_aio()
> > > hack because of that. aio also doesn't care, because it doesn't care
> > > about blocking - it'll happily block during issue.
> >
> > I'm not trying to debate who's bug it is, I'm just checking if I need to
> > backport a security fix.
>
> Not trying to place blame.
>
> > > > Jens, is it really FMODE_NOWAIT that controls whether we can hit this? A
> > > > very cursory glance leads me to suspect "no", it seems like this is a
> > > > bug if io_uring is allowed on bcachefs at all.
> > >
> > > I just looked at bcachefs dio writes, which look to be the only case of
> > > this. And yes, for writes, if FMODE_NOWAIT isn't set, then io-wq is
> > > always involved for the IO.
> >
> > Ok, sounds like we're in the clear. I already started writing the
> > patch, so it'll just be a "now we can turn on FMODE_NOWAIT" instead of
> > a bugfix.
>
> That sounds good - and FMODE_NOWAIT will be a good addition. It'll make
> RWF_NOWAIT work, and things like io_uring will also work better as it
> won't need to needlessly punt to an io-wq worker to complete this IO.
>
> > By the way, did the lifetime issue that was causing umount/remount to
> > fail ever get resolved? I've currently got no test coverage for
> > io_uring, would be nice to flip that back on.
>
> Nope, I do have an updated branch since then, but it's still sitting
> waiting on getting a bit more love. I suspect it'll be done for 6.14.
Alright - if you want to ping me when that's ready, along with any other
knobs I should flip on for io_uring support, I'll flip io_uring back on
in my test infrastructure at that time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-27 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 16:57 bcachefs: suspicious mm pointer in struct dio_write Jann Horn
2024-11-27 18:09 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-27 19:43 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-27 20:01 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-27 20:31 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-11-27 20:25 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-11-27 20:44 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-27 21:08 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-11-27 21:16 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-27 21:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-11-27 21:51 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-27 21:58 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2024-11-27 21:59 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-27 21:39 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-27 21:52 ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-27 21:53 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-27 20:23 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=hrx6kaqeyqdchmv24xivrooyimackqx5mxm6vlvj3y5gusxgno@gjsbtm76unrs \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox