From: Daniel Hodges <daniel@danielhodges.dev>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Daniel Hodges <git@danielhodges.dev>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] io_uring: add IPC channel infrastructure
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:13:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hzb3i37w6isn7gx7jqc223fmznxxjmqvlxke2rdb3lb43htifq@j45xx427nppc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6e64251-2025-438c-92d6-71b44927b437@kernel.dk>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 04:17:05PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/16/26 6:49 AM, Daniel Hodges wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 10:54:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 3/14/26 7:50 AM, Daniel Hodges wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2026 at 01:07:37PM +0000, Daniel Hodges wrote:
> >>>> Performance (virtme-ng VM, single-socket, msg_size sweep 64B-32KB):
> >>>>
> >>>> Point-to-point latency (64B-32KB messages):
> >>>> io_uring unicast: 597-3,185 ns/msg (within 1.5-2.5x of pipe for small msgs)
> >>>
> >>> Benchmark sources used to generate the numbers in the cover letter:
> >>>
> >>> io_uring IPC modes (broadcast, multicast, unicast):
> >>> https://gist.github.com/hodgesds/fbcd8bb8497bc0ec2bf1f95244a984fe#file-io_uring_ipc_bench-c
> >>>
> >>> IPC comparison (pipes, unix sockets, shm+eventfd):
> >>> https://gist.github.com/hodgesds/fbcd8bb8497bc0ec2bf1f95244a984fe#file-ipc_comparison_bench-c
> >>
> >> Thanks for sending these, was going to ask you about them. I'll take a
> >> look at your patches Monday.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jens Axboe
> >
> > No rush, thanks for taking the time!
>
> I took a look - and I think it's quite apparent that it's a AI vibe
> coded patch. Hence my first question is, do you have a specific use case
> in mind? Or phrased differently, was this done for a specific use case
> you have and want to pursue, or was it more of a "let's see if we can do
> this and what it'd look like" kind of thing?
>
> I have a lot of comments on the patch itself, but let's establish the
> motivation here first.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
I've been helping Alexandre prototype a D-Bus broker replacement that
scales better on large machines. Here's some docs/benchmarks:
https://github.com/fiorix/sbus/blob/main/sbus-broker/docs/analysis.md
The idea for this RFC by trying to come up with a design if D-Bus was to
be built from the ground so that it could scale on large machines. D-Bus
was built because the kernel never really had a broadcast/multicast
solution for IPC and kdbus demonstrated that moving dbus into the kernel
wasn't viable either. So that's where I sort of landed on the idea of
what if io_uring could be used for this type of IPC.
There isn't a working io_uring backed D-Bus implementation yet as
it would require features that aren't in this patch such a handling
credentials etc. I fully acknowledge I had AI help in working on this,
but if this idea make sense I would appreciate some human direction. If
it seems like it could be feasible from your pespective I would like to
try to give it a proper attempt. Thanks!
-Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 13:07 [RFC PATCH 0/2] io_uring: add IPC channel infrastructure Daniel Hodges
2026-03-13 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add high-performance " Daniel Hodges
2026-03-13 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftests/ipc: Add io_uring IPC selftest Daniel Hodges
2026-03-14 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] io_uring: add IPC channel infrastructure Daniel Hodges
2026-03-14 16:54 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-14 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 12:49 ` Daniel Hodges
2026-03-16 22:17 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-16 23:13 ` Daniel Hodges [this message]
2026-03-16 23:26 ` Daniel Hodges
2026-03-17 1:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=hzb3i37w6isn7gx7jqc223fmznxxjmqvlxke2rdb3lb43htifq@j45xx427nppc \
--to=daniel@danielhodges.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=git@danielhodges.dev \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox