From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE501A072A; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738063363; cv=none; b=WIed3RYgYQwzRJ8kptd6WG0A7azbhd6tlAJ8xEBUaWX2ov0kUBy04gQIi6BbWu8tMFYNKl75YN8czkWDvn+WWRj8QIwQhjvvqbNMsrA3L5EA19mI/kH3RDJIhN/o6fCHiQgk2PAGt6/tbb88ey/PRCR2gcvdGF3miENGXU3HHl8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738063363; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AJfDJn9pFkPItjs+l9CjDlC33TdlTCE01Kr4mfJIOJE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g+cCyGb2/fsQowQreYNLg9qSUrLirXR7MS1CsgJTWL5oNhbhe1swUVk/CwSswe8PDryMSusPUfNKlrWUa3532e8R+YEEmmA4oN6QzpCINKU580mS3vkG99WHUT1yexgg3lDas9CYY6cW1AeZPm219ztniPyeJErJcq9Nc2Lg5xE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=foTouGKI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="foTouGKI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98109C4CEDF; Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:22:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738063362; bh=AJfDJn9pFkPItjs+l9CjDlC33TdlTCE01Kr4mfJIOJE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=foTouGKI5Xpt6DiifiySGU1Px4B0JlxynZkL/A+4GJ+F1wUAFkM/N4G83a9sI8N06 lsMHA2F0I+BGkV1h4oylhwmSeJznMzbN+UJy9qwbYRK5QlpfqNfv8Msq/ndA/iDm4I JYp3P2GR22dNEIcBnZOOATJGYPU+gMIFK9XfLLma3B24+UKToDLZL/ZLBF6bwp16qy HMKr9svtYad8MrCuOMMF5t2I0WLB8bGS9HGYMu9w94+SD6sanYCztaTmP2cubx4D+F lhSPEntAtoYhJR/j92VqRwE5MifEf7tNzvj9NQnTwv0sbHofELHMou005/QzH1lonP yczCENnq4hKEA== Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:22:37 +0100 From: Joel Granados To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jani Nikula , Ard Biesheuvel , Alexander Gordeev , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Kees Cook , Luis Chamberlain , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , "Steven Rostedt (Google)" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "Darrick J. Wong" , Corey Minyard Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] treewide: const qualify ctl_tables where applicable Message-ID: References: <20250110-jag-ctl_table_const-v2-1-0000e1663144@kernel.org> <87jzag9ugx.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 03:42:39PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > You could have static const within functions too. You get the rodata > > protection and function local scope, best of both worlds? > > timer_active is on the stack, so it can't be static const. > > Does this really need to be cc'd to such a wide distribution list? That is a very good question. I removed 160 people from the original e-mail and left the ones that where previously involved with this patch and left all the lists for good measure. But it seems I can reduce it even more. How about this: For these treewide efforts I just leave the people that are/were involved in the series and add two lists: linux-kernel and linux-hardening. Unless someone screams, I'll try this out on my next treewide. Thx for the feedback Best -- Joel Granados