From: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>
Cc: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] common/rc: force enable io_uring in _require_io_uring
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:59:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306154324.GZ6188@frogsfrogsfrogs> (Darrick J. Wong's message of "Wed, 6 Mar 2024 07:43:24 -0800")
"Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:19:35PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
>> If kernel supports io_uring, userspace still can/might disable that
>> supporting by set /proc/sys/kernel/io_uring_disabled=2. Let's set
>> it to 0, to always enable io_uring (ignore error if there's not
>> that file).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> common/rc | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
>> index 50dde313..966c92e3 100644
>> --- a/common/rc
>> +++ b/common/rc
>> @@ -2317,6 +2317,9 @@ _require_aiodio()
>> # this test requires that the kernel supports IO_URING
>> _require_io_uring()
>> {
>> + # Force enable io_uring if kernel supports it
>> + sysctl -w kernel.io_uring_disabled=0 &> /dev/null
>
> _require_XXX functions are supposed to be predicates that _notrun the
> test if XXX isn't configured or available. Shouldn't this be:
>
> local io_uring_knob="$(sysctl --values kernel.io_uring_disabled)"
> test "$io_uring_knob" -ne 0 && _notrun "io_uring disabled by admin"
That sounds like a good option to me.
> Alternately -- if it _is_ ok to turn this knob, then there should be a
> cleanup method to put it back after the test.
I think it would be better not to change the setting, especially if the
admin had disabled it.
Cheers,
Jeff
>
> --D
>
>> +
>> $here/src/feature -R
>> case $? in
>> 0)
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 9:19 [PATCH 0/3] fstests: fix io_uring testing Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 9:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] fsstress: check io_uring_queue_init errno properly Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 15:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-06 19:34 ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 15:56 ` Jeff Moyer
2024-03-06 9:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] fsstress: bypass io_uring testing if io_uring_queue_init returns EPERM Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-06 19:36 ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 15:57 ` Jeff Moyer
2024-03-06 19:38 ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 9:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] common/rc: force enable io_uring in _require_io_uring Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 15:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-06 15:59 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2024-03-06 19:56 ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-06 19:51 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox