From: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
To: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugo Villeneuve <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
"David S. Miller" <[email protected]>,
Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>,
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>, Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] net: expose sock_use_custom_sol_socket
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 16:12:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Breno Leitao's message of "Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:21:03 -0700")
Breno Leitao <[email protected]> writes:
> Hello Hugo,
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 12:13:23PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 06:40:41 -0700
>> Breno Leitao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Exposing function sock_use_custom_sol_socket(), so it could be used by
>> > io_uring subsystem.
>> >
>> > This function will be used in the function io_uring_cmd_setsockopt() in
>> > the coming patch, so, let's move it to the socket.h header file.
>>
>> Hi,
>> this description doesn't seem to match the code change below...
>
> I re-read the patch comment and it seems to match what the code does,
> so, probably this description only makes sense to me (?).
>
> That said, hat have you understood from reading the description above?
The comment states the function prototype is moving to socket.h, but the
patch puts it in net.h.
Cheers,
Jeff
>
> Thanks for the review,
>
>> > ---
>> > include/linux/net.h | 5 +++++
>> > net/socket.c | 5 -----
>> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
>> > index 41c608c1b02c..14a956e4530e 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/net.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/net.h
>> > @@ -355,4 +355,9 @@ u32 kernel_sock_ip_overhead(struct sock *sk);
>> > #define MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_NAME(pf, proto, name) \
>> > MODULE_ALIAS("net-pf-" __stringify(pf) "-proto-" __stringify(proto) \
>> > name)
>> > +
>> > +static inline bool sock_use_custom_sol_socket(const struct socket *sock)
>> > +{
>> > + return test_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &sock->flags);
>> > +}
>> > #endif /* _LINUX_NET_H */
>> > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
>> > index 1dc23f5298ba..8df54352af83 100644
>> > --- a/net/socket.c
>> > +++ b/net/socket.c
>> > @@ -2216,11 +2216,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(recv, int, fd, void __user *, ubuf, size_t, size,
>> > return __sys_recvfrom(fd, ubuf, size, flags, NULL, NULL);
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static bool sock_use_custom_sol_socket(const struct socket *sock)
>> > -{
>> > - return test_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &sock->flags);
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > /*
>> > * Set a socket option. Because we don't know the option lengths we have
>> > * to pass the user mode parameter for the protocols to sort out.
>> > --
>> > 2.34.1
>> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-08 13:40 [PATCH v2 0/8] io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] net: expose sock_use_custom_sol_socket Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 16:13 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2023-08-08 17:21 ` Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 17:46 ` Hugo Villeneuve
2023-08-09 9:39 ` Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 20:12 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT Breno Leitao
2023-08-09 4:07 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-09 10:27 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-09 13:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-08-10 12:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT Breno Leitao
2023-08-09 6:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-09 11:09 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] io_uring/cmd: Extend support beyond SOL_SOCKET Breno Leitao
2023-08-09 16:32 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] bpf: Leverage sockptr_t in BPF getsockopt hook Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] bpf: Leverage sockptr_t in BPF setsockopt hook Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] io_uring/cmd: BPF hook for getsockopt cmd Breno Leitao
2023-08-09 4:17 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-09 16:46 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-08-10 8:26 ` Breno Leitao
2023-08-08 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] io_uring/cmd: BPF hook for setsockopt cmd Breno Leitao
2023-08-09 22:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-08-08 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands Stanislav Fomichev
2023-08-09 9:40 ` Breno Leitao
2023-08-09 16:26 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox